http://peoplespacesl.org/forum/ Tue, 07 Sep 2010 14:42:08 +0000 MyBB http://peoplespacesl.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=28 Tue, 30 Mar 2010 05:19:54 -0400 http://peoplespacesl.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=28
Full Report is attached to download.]]>
Full Report is attached to download.]]> http://peoplespacesl.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=27 Tue, 30 Mar 2010 05:17:21 -0400 http://peoplespacesl.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=27 Started at- 11.05 am
Speakers- Parliamentarian, Women Rights activists
Activities- 
Nimalka Fernando- Sri Lanka
• It was nice to be able to participate for this.
• Sri Lanka undergoes various issues related to politics. It is worth while to speak about the issues of Sri Lanka.
• I am proud to say that Sri Lanka owes the pride of having the 1st women prime minister, and we won the right for voting women. 
• But the percentage of participating women in politics has come down presently.
• Among our parliamentary members, 13 women members’ .There are about 5-6 figures who participate actively in Sri Lanka politics.
• Few decades ago women’s freedom was limited and they were not permitted to participate in social activities like men.
• In fact women were discriminated. Money, Muscle power owes men, but not women.
• Society discriminated women as the second sex and always didn’t give change to get decisions.

Geeni-India


• Indian women are involved with the political process, but the special reason is they are very few amount of ladies. It’s not as same as men.
• Indira Gandhi was a specialised character in word politics. 
• Usually, In Indian political parties, they have a party constitution. When they are going for election, they are publishing promises leaflets for the public. In the last election, there was a phrase, “we will leave 33% for women politicians”. But it hasn’t happened.
• In Rajastan, there is 50% space for women politicians. It is the reason for happiness.
• As a suggestion, I would like to say that if we can make two children for our family, we can find time to work for politics. Usually, in India there are 7.8 children in family. Wives must want to take care of those children’s and husbands.
• Women are bearing very special place for decision-making historically. If she is making decision for home, why she can’t make decision for country and world?
• Come forward, for women and female rights.




Seleena Husain- Bangladesh

• I am a writer, and women activist 
• Nowadays no politics for men or women in Bangladesh!
• There are two women prime ministers in Bangladeshi politics.
• And I am sorry to say that this wall missed a valuable women’s photo, “Sheek Haseena”
She was a valuable resource for our country, because she woke up all our women.
• Women should be more powerful. And as regional countries we can work together for political rights of women. If it is possible, we will be very successful region.



Musha Hearly – from Pakistan
• There is a 33 years severe suffering in Pakistan. Pakistan women very good family background and economic background but they lack political background.
• They are highly unorganized. They are victims of harassment, sexual violence, and rights violation.
• Here is no space for women in all the structures, education, economic, social etc.
• There needs to be more empowerment 



Sharmila Karki – Nepal
• There is plenty of room for women in political parties
• 40% of women in Malaysia today women are very much involved in the Marvest Party
• The recommendation is that women take a more active role within the party
• Women must think about decision making, education, socialism and they must change their attitude and become more progressive.

Written by Gayathri]]> Started at- 11.05 am
Speakers- Parliamentarian, Women Rights activists
Activities- 
Nimalka Fernando- Sri Lanka
• It was nice to be able to participate for this.
• Sri Lanka undergoes various issues related to politics. It is worth while to speak about the issues of Sri Lanka.
• I am proud to say that Sri Lanka owes the pride of having the 1st women prime minister, and we won the right for voting women. 
• But the percentage of participating women in politics has come down presently.
• Among our parliamentary members, 13 women members’ .There are about 5-6 figures who participate actively in Sri Lanka politics.
• Few decades ago women’s freedom was limited and they were not permitted to participate in social activities like men.
• In fact women were discriminated. Money, Muscle power owes men, but not women.
• Society discriminated women as the second sex and always didn’t give change to get decisions.

Geeni-India


• Indian women are involved with the political process, but the special reason is they are very few amount of ladies. It’s not as same as men.
• Indira Gandhi was a specialised character in word politics. 
• Usually, In Indian political parties, they have a party constitution. When they are going for election, they are publishing promises leaflets for the public. In the last election, there was a phrase, “we will leave 33% for women politicians”. But it hasn’t happened.
• In Rajastan, there is 50% space for women politicians. It is the reason for happiness.
• As a suggestion, I would like to say that if we can make two children for our family, we can find time to work for politics. Usually, in India there are 7.8 children in family. Wives must want to take care of those children’s and husbands.
• Women are bearing very special place for decision-making historically. If she is making decision for home, why she can’t make decision for country and world?
• Come forward, for women and female rights.




Seleena Husain- Bangladesh

• I am a writer, and women activist 
• Nowadays no politics for men or women in Bangladesh!
• There are two women prime ministers in Bangladeshi politics.
• And I am sorry to say that this wall missed a valuable women’s photo, “Sheek Haseena”
She was a valuable resource for our country, because she woke up all our women.
• Women should be more powerful. And as regional countries we can work together for political rights of women. If it is possible, we will be very successful region.



Musha Hearly – from Pakistan
• There is a 33 years severe suffering in Pakistan. Pakistan women very good family background and economic background but they lack political background.
• They are highly unorganized. They are victims of harassment, sexual violence, and rights violation.
• Here is no space for women in all the structures, education, economic, social etc.
• There needs to be more empowerment 



Sharmila Karki – Nepal
• There is plenty of room for women in political parties
• 40% of women in Malaysia today women are very much involved in the Marvest Party
• The recommendation is that women take a more active role within the party
• Women must think about decision making, education, socialism and they must change their attitude and become more progressive.

Written by Gayathri]]> http://peoplespacesl.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=26 Tue, 30 Mar 2010 05:16:49 -0400 http://peoplespacesl.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=26 • Not many people were there so it turned into a roundtable discussion where the floor was open for anyone to speak
• People expressed different concerns about the issue of housing
• Housing is a fundamental right, everyone should have the ability to shelter themselves and be bale to have a home
• In Sri Lanka there needs to be a greater recognition and outcry for housing for the plantation workers
• There were many housing schemes in 1975 but most of these housing schemes were very discriminatory towards the minority
• There were basically not allowed to own homes
• In 2003 there are now more than 100,000 stateless people in Sri Lanka
• In India, Mumbai grew with the growth of textile mills
• But in 1992 there was the famous textile strike and after the strike many workers lost their jobs
• Of 10 mills, 25,000 mill workers were laid off without any money or source of income
• There was another demonstration for the government to accept worker’s rights over extra government land
• The government eventually allowed the mill owners to sell their land
• There is a general of vie that people who lives on the streets are not deserving of basic human rights and this is seen through the government’s policies and actions
• It needs to be widely accepted that housing is a right
• Even in Sri Lanka people are being evicted in the name of beautification for the upcoming SAARC conference 
• But it should also be known that the state is a different unit now in dealing with the lack of housing than it was 10 years ago, there are now more private contractors
• The city is now planned and constructed exclusively for the wealthy pushing out the poor. Many cities now there has been a rise of larger buildings from many multinational corporations and the wealthy.
• India and Sri Lanka are both victims of globalization in many ways in the context of housing it is leaving out vast numbers of the poor and making them even more impoverished stripping them of their basic human rights
• In Sri Lanka 40% of tsunami victims of still living in government sponsored camps. 
• There was a lot of money coming into Sri Lanka after the Tsunami from a variety of different places within the international community but it still has not reached the people who need it the most 
• Under Premadasa’s government in the 2000, he called this the year of housing for everyone. Unfortunately he was assassinated.
• There is still the context of more political and economic rights given to the majority rather than the minority and still an active discrimination when it comes to the Tamil people. Because Tamil plantation workers who have been the backbone of this economy for many years have been left impoverished
• There is evictions happening for new roadways and development but there is a lack of consideration of where these people will go who have no lost there homes to development. 
• The face of globalization and its impact on Sri Lanka and India needs to be re-evaluated and re-analyzed.
• The tourism coastal bed is serious being affected since there is a great amount of emphasis and development in the name of tourism and the people who used to live in the place of these huge hotels now lack housing
• Cities are transforming more and more into global cities that have les and less space for the poor
• Impoverished people should have the right to humane public housing within these cities
• There needs to be more land reservation for public housing because cities are continually being urbanized
• And there is a greater and greater need for housing as the populations grows]]> • Not many people were there so it turned into a roundtable discussion where the floor was open for anyone to speak
• People expressed different concerns about the issue of housing
• Housing is a fundamental right, everyone should have the ability to shelter themselves and be bale to have a home
• In Sri Lanka there needs to be a greater recognition and outcry for housing for the plantation workers
• There were many housing schemes in 1975 but most of these housing schemes were very discriminatory towards the minority
• There were basically not allowed to own homes
• In 2003 there are now more than 100,000 stateless people in Sri Lanka
• In India, Mumbai grew with the growth of textile mills
• But in 1992 there was the famous textile strike and after the strike many workers lost their jobs
• Of 10 mills, 25,000 mill workers were laid off without any money or source of income
• There was another demonstration for the government to accept worker’s rights over extra government land
• The government eventually allowed the mill owners to sell their land
• There is a general of vie that people who lives on the streets are not deserving of basic human rights and this is seen through the government’s policies and actions
• It needs to be widely accepted that housing is a right
• Even in Sri Lanka people are being evicted in the name of beautification for the upcoming SAARC conference 
• But it should also be known that the state is a different unit now in dealing with the lack of housing than it was 10 years ago, there are now more private contractors
• The city is now planned and constructed exclusively for the wealthy pushing out the poor. Many cities now there has been a rise of larger buildings from many multinational corporations and the wealthy.
• India and Sri Lanka are both victims of globalization in many ways in the context of housing it is leaving out vast numbers of the poor and making them even more impoverished stripping them of their basic human rights
• In Sri Lanka 40% of tsunami victims of still living in government sponsored camps. 
• There was a lot of money coming into Sri Lanka after the Tsunami from a variety of different places within the international community but it still has not reached the people who need it the most 
• Under Premadasa’s government in the 2000, he called this the year of housing for everyone. Unfortunately he was assassinated.
• There is still the context of more political and economic rights given to the majority rather than the minority and still an active discrimination when it comes to the Tamil people. Because Tamil plantation workers who have been the backbone of this economy for many years have been left impoverished
• There is evictions happening for new roadways and development but there is a lack of consideration of where these people will go who have no lost there homes to development. 
• The face of globalization and its impact on Sri Lanka and India needs to be re-evaluated and re-analyzed.
• The tourism coastal bed is serious being affected since there is a great amount of emphasis and development in the name of tourism and the people who used to live in the place of these huge hotels now lack housing
• Cities are transforming more and more into global cities that have les and less space for the poor
• Impoverished people should have the right to humane public housing within these cities
• There needs to be more land reservation for public housing because cities are continually being urbanized
• And there is a greater and greater need for housing as the populations grows]]> http://peoplespacesl.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=25 Tue, 30 Mar 2010 05:15:57 -0400 http://peoplespacesl.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=25 South Asian People’s Assembly, Colombo

SAARC Convention - Session on Trafficking

The panel consisted of four speakers-

Mr Zia Madhavan - Pakistan (lawyer)
Ms. Soni – WARIC Nepal
Ms. Nimalka Fernando – Sri Lanka
Ms Saleema – The Association for Community Development, Bangaldesh


Moderator –William Gois, Regional Co-ordinator

Objective - The focus of discussion The session focused on sharing experiences in trafficking within the SAARC region and the overlapping issues of trafficking and migration. 

Mr Zia Madhavan, stated that the root causes of traficking need to be understood if it is to be addressed effectively. He identified poverty as the root cause as trafficking began in poverty stricken areas where people are utterly helpless and lack the power to change their circumstances. Conflict, both within and outside the country drives people to seek safe havens and is associated with migration. 
The extent to which the situation can be alleviated depends on what governments, UN organisations and other regional governing bodies are willing to do. 


A major loophole in the SAARC Convention ratified in 2002 is that it addresses trafficking only in terms of prostitution. Trafficking is not an isolated issue, rather it needs to be viewed in the broader perspectives of domestic issues, educational and housing rights, human rights violations, violation of womens`s rights, HIV/AIDS prevention and prositution. 
He stressed that governments within the region have a primary duty to protect their civilians both within and outside their countries.. This becomes extremely relevant when dealing with the issues of trafficking and migration. 
Patriarchal societies in Asian countries predispose to violence against women. 
Laws framed to deal with trafficking and migration appear to exist on paper as there seems to be no visible evidence that they are being implemented. 
The situation is no different regarding the SAARC Convention.When the SAARC Traffic Task Force met in Delhi in 2007 civil society rerpresentation from some countries were notably absent.
Involvement of civil society is vital to increase visbility of the issues of trafficking and migration. Mr Madhavan concluded that it was necessary to implement laws, increase awareness thorugh civil society initiatives and adopt a holistic approach to the issue of trafficking. 

Miss Soni referred to the trafficking of women occurring between Nepal and India. Her organisation WARIC was established in 1995 following the resuce of women from a Bombay brothel. WARIC has broadbased its activities to include policy and advocacy and prevention. Advocacy and review of governement policy on trafficking, is currently dysfunctional due to a lack of resources. Preventive work focuses on social and economic empowerment of women, gender based violence (GBV) and issues of adolescents. 

In Nepal women taken on the pretext of legitimate work end up as prostitutes and many who return home are infected with HIV and other venereal disease. She observed that the line between trafficking and migration is so fine that it is usually difficult to differentiate between the two. 
WARIC has started an information centre to provide assistance to women who migrate for employment in neighbouring countries. But this service is not utilised enough due to the strongly prevailing patriarchal notions in Nepalese society similar to other SAARC countries. 
Furthermore, governments are generally not too concerned with issues pertaining to women and therefore it is generally difficult to identify and punish the perpetrator. .
But implementing existing laws would redeem the situation to some extent. 

Ms. Nimalka Fernando, addressed the regional perspectives of trafficking and migration. of this issue. Migration of Sri Lankan women to the Middle Eastern countries as housemaids has become a critical issue. It is difficult to assess the enormity of the issue due to insufficient research into the problem. 
However, two laws have been passed in Sri Lanka which have been borrowed directly from the SAARC Convention. But they address the issue of trafficking only in connection to prostitution.
The Sri Lankan situation is bleak due to a failure to understand trafficking within the cultural framework of Sri Lankan society. Trafficking is not always migration or vice versa. Many are either misinformed, confused or completely ignorant of the issue..Creating awareness in such a situation is a challenge. Sri Lanka needs ot establish strong networks to care for and protect the rights of victims of trafficking and ensure that available laws are enforced 


Ms. Saleema – representative of the Association of Community Development operates in the extreme border areas of West Bengal and was started in 1995. 
She stressed the need to look at trafficking holistically in order ot understand its root causes. 

Child labour is also a component of trafficking and needs to be given considerable emphasis. In Nepal and India predominantly the strong network of child labour and prostitution is the result of young boys becoming victims of trafficking due to the open borders. For example, manual labourers from bangle factories are easy prey for such illegal activities. 
These issues further emphasis the fact that trafficking is not limited to prostitution, but is integral to the human rights violations, labour issues, and other issues in a country. 


(Mr Ansar Amar Khan) - Reference was made to the recent quota system introduced by the government of Bangladesh as a basis for recruiting agencies. As legal migration is more than twice as costly, in poverty stricken areas, many parents are forced to succumb to the evil practice of trafficking their children in order to survive. 



At the end of the presentations the floor was opened for discussions. 

Mr Iqrak of Bangladesh posed the question of how to address the issue of women and children who are used as drug carriers by border drug trafficking networks and in the process are sexually exploited and at risk of contracting HIV and venereal disease. 

Mr Zia responded that as the time required for issue of visas and border clearance for cross border travelling has been increased, it has restricted the earlier easy flow of traffickers. He stressed the need for foreign ministers and other dignitaries to work together to address the issue more forcefully. Further, maintaining a reasonable minimum wage for manual labour was important to prevent an atmosphere conducive to trafficking. Innovative measures need to be found to address the issue of trafficking

Ms Niluffer from Bangladesh stated that reducing the poverty line and providing more increasing job opportunities locally would reduce the need for economic and employment related migration and directly contribute to a considerable reduction in trafficking 
Ms Lakshmi Chandrasekara whose organisation workls at grass root level, stated that many people do not understand the nature nad issues in trafficking. Following awareness programmes, an average of five out of twenty women had realised that they had been victims of trafficking of some sort. 

Ms Nimalka Fernando added that due to the stigma and violence associated with prostitution, , many women do not admit to the full extent of exploitation. This makes it , difficult to assess the enormity of the situation.

Mr Nadesan, of the Human Development Organization, Kandy stated that migration in the plantation sector migration is common because the wages are not commensurate with labour, even though the plantation sector is the highest income generator in the country.

Another important point that was raised was that addressing the problem of trafficking along with that of unemployment and labour issues would help to reduce the stigma and the trauma experienced by victims and make it easier for them to state their cases. This should be taken up more forcefully by the NGOs and GOs working in this area. 

Mr Zia and Ms Nimalka Ferando stressed that trade unions should incorporate such issues into their agendas. Thus, along with the debates on salary increments and labour union strikes, issues of abusive labour, and bonded labour will also be discussed.

The issue of disability was another area that was touched upon. Children taken as jockies to Arabian countries is an issue of serious concern. The organization Apna Sahana (Self Help/my own help) works in the area of disability caused by polio, road accidents and trafficking. It has been noted that many syndicates cripple children and use them as beggars to further their own selfish interests. Such issues also fall under trafficking and illegal migration and must be dealt with severely. 

It was also noted that parents should be empowered and that governments should provide better and more reliable sources of income to parents, in order to remove the burden of supproting the family form the shoulders of youngsters. ensure that the responsibility of providing for their families do not rest on the shoulders of youngsters. In this manner trafficking could be gradually curbed and brought to a standstill.

Summary-

Trafficking and migration are rooted in poverty and need to be addressed within a broad framework of economic, social and cultural strategies. 
Legal measures available at present must be strictly enforced. 
The SAARC Convention needs to be amended to include and give visibility to the issues of trafficking and migration.
Effectively addressing trafficking and migration requires measures to 
• prevent /reduce human rights violations
• Ensure rights of women and children
• Provide a living wage to families to prevent child labour and child trafficking for family survival
Have secure ‘open’ borders]]> South Asian People’s Assembly, Colombo

SAARC Convention - Session on Trafficking

The panel consisted of four speakers-

Mr Zia Madhavan - Pakistan (lawyer)
Ms. Soni – WARIC Nepal
Ms. Nimalka Fernando – Sri Lanka
Ms Saleema – The Association for Community Development, Bangaldesh


Moderator –William Gois, Regional Co-ordinator

Objective - The focus of discussion The session focused on sharing experiences in trafficking within the SAARC region and the overlapping issues of trafficking and migration. 

Mr Zia Madhavan, stated that the root causes of traficking need to be understood if it is to be addressed effectively. He identified poverty as the root cause as trafficking began in poverty stricken areas where people are utterly helpless and lack the power to change their circumstances. Conflict, both within and outside the country drives people to seek safe havens and is associated with migration. 
The extent to which the situation can be alleviated depends on what governments, UN organisations and other regional governing bodies are willing to do. 


A major loophole in the SAARC Convention ratified in 2002 is that it addresses trafficking only in terms of prostitution. Trafficking is not an isolated issue, rather it needs to be viewed in the broader perspectives of domestic issues, educational and housing rights, human rights violations, violation of womens`s rights, HIV/AIDS prevention and prositution. 
He stressed that governments within the region have a primary duty to protect their civilians both within and outside their countries.. This becomes extremely relevant when dealing with the issues of trafficking and migration. 
Patriarchal societies in Asian countries predispose to violence against women. 
Laws framed to deal with trafficking and migration appear to exist on paper as there seems to be no visible evidence that they are being implemented. 
The situation is no different regarding the SAARC Convention.When the SAARC Traffic Task Force met in Delhi in 2007 civil society rerpresentation from some countries were notably absent.
Involvement of civil society is vital to increase visbility of the issues of trafficking and migration. Mr Madhavan concluded that it was necessary to implement laws, increase awareness thorugh civil society initiatives and adopt a holistic approach to the issue of trafficking. 

Miss Soni referred to the trafficking of women occurring between Nepal and India. Her organisation WARIC was established in 1995 following the resuce of women from a Bombay brothel. WARIC has broadbased its activities to include policy and advocacy and prevention. Advocacy and review of governement policy on trafficking, is currently dysfunctional due to a lack of resources. Preventive work focuses on social and economic empowerment of women, gender based violence (GBV) and issues of adolescents. 

In Nepal women taken on the pretext of legitimate work end up as prostitutes and many who return home are infected with HIV and other venereal disease. She observed that the line between trafficking and migration is so fine that it is usually difficult to differentiate between the two. 
WARIC has started an information centre to provide assistance to women who migrate for employment in neighbouring countries. But this service is not utilised enough due to the strongly prevailing patriarchal notions in Nepalese society similar to other SAARC countries. 
Furthermore, governments are generally not too concerned with issues pertaining to women and therefore it is generally difficult to identify and punish the perpetrator. .
But implementing existing laws would redeem the situation to some extent. 

Ms. Nimalka Fernando, addressed the regional perspectives of trafficking and migration. of this issue. Migration of Sri Lankan women to the Middle Eastern countries as housemaids has become a critical issue. It is difficult to assess the enormity of the issue due to insufficient research into the problem. 
However, two laws have been passed in Sri Lanka which have been borrowed directly from the SAARC Convention. But they address the issue of trafficking only in connection to prostitution.
The Sri Lankan situation is bleak due to a failure to understand trafficking within the cultural framework of Sri Lankan society. Trafficking is not always migration or vice versa. Many are either misinformed, confused or completely ignorant of the issue..Creating awareness in such a situation is a challenge. Sri Lanka needs ot establish strong networks to care for and protect the rights of victims of trafficking and ensure that available laws are enforced 


Ms. Saleema – representative of the Association of Community Development operates in the extreme border areas of West Bengal and was started in 1995. 
She stressed the need to look at trafficking holistically in order ot understand its root causes. 

Child labour is also a component of trafficking and needs to be given considerable emphasis. In Nepal and India predominantly the strong network of child labour and prostitution is the result of young boys becoming victims of trafficking due to the open borders. For example, manual labourers from bangle factories are easy prey for such illegal activities. 
These issues further emphasis the fact that trafficking is not limited to prostitution, but is integral to the human rights violations, labour issues, and other issues in a country. 


(Mr Ansar Amar Khan) - Reference was made to the recent quota system introduced by the government of Bangladesh as a basis for recruiting agencies. As legal migration is more than twice as costly, in poverty stricken areas, many parents are forced to succumb to the evil practice of trafficking their children in order to survive. 



At the end of the presentations the floor was opened for discussions. 

Mr Iqrak of Bangladesh posed the question of how to address the issue of women and children who are used as drug carriers by border drug trafficking networks and in the process are sexually exploited and at risk of contracting HIV and venereal disease. 

Mr Zia responded that as the time required for issue of visas and border clearance for cross border travelling has been increased, it has restricted the earlier easy flow of traffickers. He stressed the need for foreign ministers and other dignitaries to work together to address the issue more forcefully. Further, maintaining a reasonable minimum wage for manual labour was important to prevent an atmosphere conducive to trafficking. Innovative measures need to be found to address the issue of trafficking

Ms Niluffer from Bangladesh stated that reducing the poverty line and providing more increasing job opportunities locally would reduce the need for economic and employment related migration and directly contribute to a considerable reduction in trafficking 
Ms Lakshmi Chandrasekara whose organisation workls at grass root level, stated that many people do not understand the nature nad issues in trafficking. Following awareness programmes, an average of five out of twenty women had realised that they had been victims of trafficking of some sort. 

Ms Nimalka Fernando added that due to the stigma and violence associated with prostitution, , many women do not admit to the full extent of exploitation. This makes it , difficult to assess the enormity of the situation.

Mr Nadesan, of the Human Development Organization, Kandy stated that migration in the plantation sector migration is common because the wages are not commensurate with labour, even though the plantation sector is the highest income generator in the country.

Another important point that was raised was that addressing the problem of trafficking along with that of unemployment and labour issues would help to reduce the stigma and the trauma experienced by victims and make it easier for them to state their cases. This should be taken up more forcefully by the NGOs and GOs working in this area. 

Mr Zia and Ms Nimalka Ferando stressed that trade unions should incorporate such issues into their agendas. Thus, along with the debates on salary increments and labour union strikes, issues of abusive labour, and bonded labour will also be discussed.

The issue of disability was another area that was touched upon. Children taken as jockies to Arabian countries is an issue of serious concern. The organization Apna Sahana (Self Help/my own help) works in the area of disability caused by polio, road accidents and trafficking. It has been noted that many syndicates cripple children and use them as beggars to further their own selfish interests. Such issues also fall under trafficking and illegal migration and must be dealt with severely. 

It was also noted that parents should be empowered and that governments should provide better and more reliable sources of income to parents, in order to remove the burden of supproting the family form the shoulders of youngsters. ensure that the responsibility of providing for their families do not rest on the shoulders of youngsters. In this manner trafficking could be gradually curbed and brought to a standstill.

Summary-

Trafficking and migration are rooted in poverty and need to be addressed within a broad framework of economic, social and cultural strategies. 
Legal measures available at present must be strictly enforced. 
The SAARC Convention needs to be amended to include and give visibility to the issues of trafficking and migration.
Effectively addressing trafficking and migration requires measures to 
• prevent /reduce human rights violations
• Ensure rights of women and children
• Provide a living wage to families to prevent child labour and child trafficking for family survival
Have secure ‘open’ borders]]> http://peoplespacesl.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=24 Tue, 30 Mar 2010 05:15:20 -0400 http://peoplespacesl.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=24 South Asian People’s Assembly, Colombo


1. Plenary Session – Speaker Iqbal – Pakistan

• Commended the people of Nepal in their struggle for freedom, the unity of the common people who liberated by getting rid of the Monarchy which is a great achievement and aspiration to others in the SAARC Region and South Asia.
• Complimented the Communist party of India for not opposing the collaboration the nuclear imperialism.
• Appreciated the freedom struggle of other countries in SA with regard to their issues.
• Further stated that the date of the fall of the present Pakistan government is not very far. The rule of Pakistan after 9 March 2007, the rule of the people struggle of the people rule of democracy, rule of the judiciary has started in an unprecedented manner. The 5th rule of Martial law, unprecedented manner promulgated by Zia ul-Haq master of US power. The rule Parvees Musharraf had ruined the country in all aspects.
• He further spoke of the two petty issues which could be resolved easily.
1. Kashmir
2. Water problem

Kashmir issue could be resolved in two phases 
-open the border
- interaction between two regions

As in the case of EU, ASEAN, African Unity Alliance, Arab Union and Latin 
America. Why can’t we have open discussions not abstract emotional slogans?

Future generations cannot survive feared by the imperialist forces. Realizing the challenges in the South Asian region, the religious fanatics, against the extremist. Militants a vacuum created by the US. It’s like feeding milk to the cobras, blaming our own people. The incidence of 9/11, US, 7/7 in England 10/3 Spain
Every one knows who created the likes of Osama ….. who nurtured it? Who gave birth to the religious extremists, .who is providing weapons. Our people are not against Afghanistan. The Movement in Pakistan, Marshal Law, all because of the manufacturing of armament creation of conflict.

Largest building construction companies both ways benefited

Get rid of combat, terrorist, extremists.
Identify who is responsible for that who alone can defeat them build a forum 
A human rights forum, need for a legal binding force
A forum to highlight the injustices 
Forum to ensure the rights of the South Asian people devoid of extremist, religious fundamentalists, terrorists.

Mobilize the power of the people. We have enough intellectuals, formal tribunals to take responsibility to coordinate a people’ forum. 

Suggestion Nominate two persons from the each country in SA to set up a tribunal for people of SAARC.

Sri Lanka Sunila Abeysekera

Bad period facing crisis – issues in different forms
Media personnel TIssanayagam 165 days under arrest.
Erosion of judiciary, economy \]]> South Asian People’s Assembly, Colombo


1. Plenary Session – Speaker Iqbal – Pakistan

• Commended the people of Nepal in their struggle for freedom, the unity of the common people who liberated by getting rid of the Monarchy which is a great achievement and aspiration to others in the SAARC Region and South Asia.
• Complimented the Communist party of India for not opposing the collaboration the nuclear imperialism.
• Appreciated the freedom struggle of other countries in SA with regard to their issues.
• Further stated that the date of the fall of the present Pakistan government is not very far. The rule of Pakistan after 9 March 2007, the rule of the people struggle of the people rule of democracy, rule of the judiciary has started in an unprecedented manner. The 5th rule of Martial law, unprecedented manner promulgated by Zia ul-Haq master of US power. The rule Parvees Musharraf had ruined the country in all aspects.
• He further spoke of the two petty issues which could be resolved easily.
1. Kashmir
2. Water problem

Kashmir issue could be resolved in two phases 
-open the border
- interaction between two regions

As in the case of EU, ASEAN, African Unity Alliance, Arab Union and Latin 
America. Why can’t we have open discussions not abstract emotional slogans?

Future generations cannot survive feared by the imperialist forces. Realizing the challenges in the South Asian region, the religious fanatics, against the extremist. Militants a vacuum created by the US. It’s like feeding milk to the cobras, blaming our own people. The incidence of 9/11, US, 7/7 in England 10/3 Spain
Every one knows who created the likes of Osama ….. who nurtured it? Who gave birth to the religious extremists, .who is providing weapons. Our people are not against Afghanistan. The Movement in Pakistan, Marshal Law, all because of the manufacturing of armament creation of conflict.

Largest building construction companies both ways benefited

Get rid of combat, terrorist, extremists.
Identify who is responsible for that who alone can defeat them build a forum 
A human rights forum, need for a legal binding force
A forum to highlight the injustices 
Forum to ensure the rights of the South Asian people devoid of extremist, religious fundamentalists, terrorists.

Mobilize the power of the people. We have enough intellectuals, formal tribunals to take responsibility to coordinate a people’ forum. 

Suggestion Nominate two persons from the each country in SA to set up a tribunal for people of SAARC.

Sri Lanka Sunila Abeysekera

Bad period facing crisis – issues in different forms
Media personnel TIssanayagam 165 days under arrest.
Erosion of judiciary, economy \]]> http://peoplespacesl.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=23 Tue, 30 Mar 2010 05:14:34 -0400 http://peoplespacesl.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=23 South Asian People’s Assembly, Colombo

SAARC Convention on basic health needs-

This session addressed the following issues-as presented by the speakers and raised by the audience in discussion
• maternal death in south asia
• health sector financing
• health privatisation and globalization
• health systems
• hiv/aids
• health services- state, private and ngo sectors
• health issues of sex workers
• health in conflict situations
• health rights of women



 maternal deaths in south asia

There is a very high rate of maternal deaths in the south asian region. in contrast, sri lanka has a very much lower rate, due to a highly developed healk care infrastructure, recheaching down to the grass root level. in the south asian region, poor delivery practices are responsible for a high proportion of maternal deaths. 15% of all maternal deaths in south asia occurs in uttar pradesh. deaths are primarily in poverty stricken areas and in india, home deliveries are still the practice, even though women are given monetary incentives to deliver in hospitals. 
available statistics are only estimates and do not accurately reflect the real extent of maternal deaths. the high rate of maternal death has become a critical human rights issue and an issue of women’s rights. to combat this situation it is necessary to change perceptions of women and society through grass-root movements that mobilize women and other stake holders. 

it is recommended that greater investment in general and maternal health systems, audit of every maternal death, increasing awareness among doctors and nurses with emphasis on gender sensitization should be done. for example, nepal has been able to reduce maternal mortality throught community mobilization of women.




 health sector financing-

health sector financing needs to be reviwed and govenernment allocations for health need to be increased. in sri lanka and india 5% of the gdp is allocated for health. private health sector should not be subsidized by the public sector. more trained manpower for example, nurses should be available, as the ratio of doctors to nurses is very low.
number of general practitioners need to be increased. 
the role of the pharmaceutical sector needs to be reviewed.


 health privatisation and globalization-

the right to good health is universal.
health has both public and social dimensions and people need to be empowered for health, but international and regional organizations carry obligations and responsibilities for the health of people.
in the south asian region, rising costs of living, drugs, and the fuel crisis impact health by reducing people’s ability to empower themselves. in many countries, physicians are protected and held less accountable for bad medical practice. 
allocation of resources for health needs to be done in an equitable manner, and primary health care in particular is in danger of being privatised. while key indicators of maternal moratality rate and infant mortality rates are used to assess the health status of countries, it must be understood that they do not provide a comprehensive assessment of the situation. 


 health systems-

across south asia the present health systems do not appear to be working adequately. people should be empowered to take the initiative for their own health. providing health care should ensure the absence of discrimination and be broad based through primary health care, and backed by political support. 
the issue of health insuarance for the poor needs to be reviewed as health is a basic right and should be a state responsibility. 


mr narendra gupta (people’s health movement) suggested the development of a framework and alternatives, leading to the saarc people’s charter. 


open forum
the lanka plus representative stated that irrespective of how hiv/aids was contracted every affected person has a right to treatment, to be free of discrimination, stigma and ostracism, to education and employment. 
though much funds are allocated for hiv/aids related work, there is need for greater transparancy. hiv/aids is not necessarily of sex workers, but rather everyone, is at risk of the disease.people living with hiv/aids tend to be ostacized in public places, schools and hospitals. 
dr prasanna cooray (public health consultant) spoke on 2 issues- 
• health services
• the private and ngo health care sectors

he stated that health is not synonymous with services. when we think of services, we think of allopathic healthcare services, but south asia is blessed with medical pluralism in that there are many types of health systems in practice. therefore, we should look at health from a south-asian perspective. good health is multifactorial.

he queried whether due recognition is given to services provided through the private and ngo health sectors. 

although overall, sri lanka has good health indicators, the plantation sector is disadvantaged. the maternal and infant mortality rates in the plantation sector still remain higher than the national average. this is attributed to the poor living conditions, economic issues and lesser access to health care. 

sex workers face a lot of social discrimination and ostracism and have multiple health issues. many are forced into the sex trade due to the lack of alternate employment. they are especially vulnerable to abuse. and even in detention they maybe discriminated against. 

the extensive use of pesticides in south asia is a serious issue, affecting the health of people. pollution from pesticides and other chemicals are responsible for a large amount mental fatigue, physical exhaustion and eye problems. 


recommendations-

1. maternal health
maternal deaths should be declared a health emergency and a cognizavle even; should be allocated increased resources in national health systems; establish a south asian health resource centre as a clearing house for information and financial outlay.

2. public health sector
the public health sector should not be privatized; should be the responsibility of central governments. 

3. the private health sector should be subject to medical audit.
4. health rights of women 
health systems should be gender sensitive, and address the needs of the girl child and adolescent, women of all ages, single women, those with disabilities, sex workers, those affected with hiv/aids, women living in conflict, war and disaster situations, women in custody of state institutions, women in the labour force, including external and internal migrants, lesbian, bisexual and transgender women, and women of caste, ethnic and religious minorities. 


a request is made for the saarc convention to agitate for the immediate release by the indian government of dr binayak sen who has been detained for treating an alleged maoist.]]> South Asian People’s Assembly, Colombo

SAARC Convention on basic health needs-

This session addressed the following issues-as presented by the speakers and raised by the audience in discussion
• maternal death in south asia
• health sector financing
• health privatisation and globalization
• health systems
• hiv/aids
• health services- state, private and ngo sectors
• health issues of sex workers
• health in conflict situations
• health rights of women



 maternal deaths in south asia

There is a very high rate of maternal deaths in the south asian region. in contrast, sri lanka has a very much lower rate, due to a highly developed healk care infrastructure, recheaching down to the grass root level. in the south asian region, poor delivery practices are responsible for a high proportion of maternal deaths. 15% of all maternal deaths in south asia occurs in uttar pradesh. deaths are primarily in poverty stricken areas and in india, home deliveries are still the practice, even though women are given monetary incentives to deliver in hospitals. 
available statistics are only estimates and do not accurately reflect the real extent of maternal deaths. the high rate of maternal death has become a critical human rights issue and an issue of women’s rights. to combat this situation it is necessary to change perceptions of women and society through grass-root movements that mobilize women and other stake holders. 

it is recommended that greater investment in general and maternal health systems, audit of every maternal death, increasing awareness among doctors and nurses with emphasis on gender sensitization should be done. for example, nepal has been able to reduce maternal mortality throught community mobilization of women.




 health sector financing-

health sector financing needs to be reviwed and govenernment allocations for health need to be increased. in sri lanka and india 5% of the gdp is allocated for health. private health sector should not be subsidized by the public sector. more trained manpower for example, nurses should be available, as the ratio of doctors to nurses is very low.
number of general practitioners need to be increased. 
the role of the pharmaceutical sector needs to be reviewed.


 health privatisation and globalization-

the right to good health is universal.
health has both public and social dimensions and people need to be empowered for health, but international and regional organizations carry obligations and responsibilities for the health of people.
in the south asian region, rising costs of living, drugs, and the fuel crisis impact health by reducing people’s ability to empower themselves. in many countries, physicians are protected and held less accountable for bad medical practice. 
allocation of resources for health needs to be done in an equitable manner, and primary health care in particular is in danger of being privatised. while key indicators of maternal moratality rate and infant mortality rates are used to assess the health status of countries, it must be understood that they do not provide a comprehensive assessment of the situation. 


 health systems-

across south asia the present health systems do not appear to be working adequately. people should be empowered to take the initiative for their own health. providing health care should ensure the absence of discrimination and be broad based through primary health care, and backed by political support. 
the issue of health insuarance for the poor needs to be reviewed as health is a basic right and should be a state responsibility. 


mr narendra gupta (people’s health movement) suggested the development of a framework and alternatives, leading to the saarc people’s charter. 


open forum
the lanka plus representative stated that irrespective of how hiv/aids was contracted every affected person has a right to treatment, to be free of discrimination, stigma and ostracism, to education and employment. 
though much funds are allocated for hiv/aids related work, there is need for greater transparancy. hiv/aids is not necessarily of sex workers, but rather everyone, is at risk of the disease.people living with hiv/aids tend to be ostacized in public places, schools and hospitals. 
dr prasanna cooray (public health consultant) spoke on 2 issues- 
• health services
• the private and ngo health care sectors

he stated that health is not synonymous with services. when we think of services, we think of allopathic healthcare services, but south asia is blessed with medical pluralism in that there are many types of health systems in practice. therefore, we should look at health from a south-asian perspective. good health is multifactorial.

he queried whether due recognition is given to services provided through the private and ngo health sectors. 

although overall, sri lanka has good health indicators, the plantation sector is disadvantaged. the maternal and infant mortality rates in the plantation sector still remain higher than the national average. this is attributed to the poor living conditions, economic issues and lesser access to health care. 

sex workers face a lot of social discrimination and ostracism and have multiple health issues. many are forced into the sex trade due to the lack of alternate employment. they are especially vulnerable to abuse. and even in detention they maybe discriminated against. 

the extensive use of pesticides in south asia is a serious issue, affecting the health of people. pollution from pesticides and other chemicals are responsible for a large amount mental fatigue, physical exhaustion and eye problems. 


recommendations-

1. maternal health
maternal deaths should be declared a health emergency and a cognizavle even; should be allocated increased resources in national health systems; establish a south asian health resource centre as a clearing house for information and financial outlay.

2. public health sector
the public health sector should not be privatized; should be the responsibility of central governments. 

3. the private health sector should be subject to medical audit.
4. health rights of women 
health systems should be gender sensitive, and address the needs of the girl child and adolescent, women of all ages, single women, those with disabilities, sex workers, those affected with hiv/aids, women living in conflict, war and disaster situations, women in custody of state institutions, women in the labour force, including external and internal migrants, lesbian, bisexual and transgender women, and women of caste, ethnic and religious minorities. 


a request is made for the saarc convention to agitate for the immediate release by the indian government of dr binayak sen who has been detained for treating an alleged maoist.]]> http://peoplespacesl.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=22 Tue, 30 Mar 2010 05:13:55 -0400 http://peoplespacesl.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=22 South Asian People’s Assembly, Colombo


Religious Extremism and Communalism 

Religious extremism we come with varied ideas and religious background. We are against Bush like systems on religious extremism. 

Our challenge is to determine how we deal with religious extremist. 

Secularism and democracy are considered as two but aren’t they one? 

Pakistan

Experience as a minority member and the difficulty faced during the critical times, intolerance, discrimination. State should protect all religions. Churches are burnt, people are terrorized, victimized etc. forced marriages are brought in; blasphemy laws enforced and instead of bringing people together are creating division. 

One main problem is that state cannot decide if law and religion are interdependent or not

India

The word Minority should be banned. In US they don’t refer to anyone as a minority. So we should alien the word minority. 

The majority of Pakistan are affected by religious extremists, a by product of communalism; first from British imperialism and second from US imperialism. 

Pakistan people are secular and democratic in nature. In 1971 there were only 7 religious persons elected after 300 members. In East Bengal, the religious parties were badly defeated. 

Now the minority has damaged social fabrics in Pakistan and now has become a potential weapon used by the West to harm the world. 

Religious extremists are not bad, per se. however, you must assess if within the religion it is bad? In Islam or Braham or Christianity the adverse level should be questioned? We should discuss the political use of religion. 

No democracy without secularism. India uses the word secularism in democracy. This resulted in respecting all religions, and the state agreeing to respect all religions. 

One thing People SAARC should do is to examine 60 years of Religious secularism in India. They should analyze history taught in schools and other state institutions on how much influence religion has. 

As civil society we should monitor human rights, particularly minority groups. World over, including US, minority groups are discriminated. We need to create a body that would address minority groups’ human rights violations. The commission should have powers to investigate and report on complaints lodged. E.g. Romanian Commission on Equal Opportunity. If individuals are discriminated they must be brought to justice. 

SAARC should monitor equal rights.

Kashmir

Serious concern on Islamic movement and international propaganda. 

The political movement in Kashmir: Does it reflect the Islamic movement? 

In South Asia we tend to focus more on religion conflicts vs. other conflicts. 

In India more people are being pushed into religious extremists, not as much spiritual but politically driven. 

Covert Communalism is on the rise. After bombs no riots take place however the division amongst people is growing. The division amongst Hindus and Muslims has grown immensely over the last few years. 

What will happen when communities divide? Civil war is probable.

Problems to recognizing minority rights;
1. Christians in India own certain top institutions. When violence breaks out, the Christians show preference to the elite, Brahmin etc. they exclude low caste. However, they fight for minority rights. Contradiction of viewpoints. 

Comments

1. Way to sabotage the terrorist who act in the name of religions is to not allow this division to take place. 
E.g. during security checks let Muslims be a part of the check, assuring the people of their safety. 

2. We should demand for secularism in SAARC, create minority commissions to safeguard rights. 

3. We need to work at SAARC level as countries normally don’t like displaced people. ‘People of no where’

4. “If you are not making justice for the just, then you are not making justice” we are here to explore peace through dialogue. 

5. In Pakistan if Hindu says few words against Holy Prophet he might be killed by police or prison mates or hung. This is the law that does not ‘tolerate’ the minority. Hence we must not say minority – we must guard our future.

6. Fundamentalists and extremism are fairly new to this region. We must consider the foreign influence. 

7. Nationalism and religion have incorporated itself to the government. In Sri Lanka there are problems within Sinhalese and Tamil, Buddhists and Christians. We have many religions but dominant people are pushing for a sovereign Buddhist nation. If NE conflict is resolved, we might have a religious conflict. Christians, Muslims and Hindus are oppressed. Many churches are being burnt. Government is turning a blind eye. However Buddhist parties (Sinhala Urumaya) and Prime Minister endorse a sovereign Buddhist country. 

8. We should have a visa free SAARC – many are detained on invalid visa grounds. 

Demands to SAARC Governments

1. Religion should be separate from state

2. All blasphemy laws should be abolished

3. Non discriminative education system – all public institutions should include minority curriculums

4. Sri Lankan government to be questioned about the promotion of a Buddhist sovereign nation

5. Persecution of minorities should be stopped

6. The state should be given a reporting system – record incidents etc. 

7. Positive enforcement of all communities 

8. These all represent breakdown in democracy 

9. Differences in religion should be addressed

10. Minority rights are symptoms to bigger issues which should be resolved

11. Establish SAARC Human Rights forum, a powerful creation of a minority groups that look into rights of religions with 50% female involvement

12. Given the history of riots, in all SAARC countries, there should be speedy honorable compensation made to the individuals

13. Special courts to bring speedy action so that justice will be brought to court

14. Government should be held responsible ad accountable]]> South Asian People’s Assembly, Colombo


Religious Extremism and Communalism 

Religious extremism we come with varied ideas and religious background. We are against Bush like systems on religious extremism. 

Our challenge is to determine how we deal with religious extremist. 

Secularism and democracy are considered as two but aren’t they one? 

Pakistan

Experience as a minority member and the difficulty faced during the critical times, intolerance, discrimination. State should protect all religions. Churches are burnt, people are terrorized, victimized etc. forced marriages are brought in; blasphemy laws enforced and instead of bringing people together are creating division. 

One main problem is that state cannot decide if law and religion are interdependent or not

India

The word Minority should be banned. In US they don’t refer to anyone as a minority. So we should alien the word minority. 

The majority of Pakistan are affected by religious extremists, a by product of communalism; first from British imperialism and second from US imperialism. 

Pakistan people are secular and democratic in nature. In 1971 there were only 7 religious persons elected after 300 members. In East Bengal, the religious parties were badly defeated. 

Now the minority has damaged social fabrics in Pakistan and now has become a potential weapon used by the West to harm the world. 

Religious extremists are not bad, per se. however, you must assess if within the religion it is bad? In Islam or Braham or Christianity the adverse level should be questioned? We should discuss the political use of religion. 

No democracy without secularism. India uses the word secularism in democracy. This resulted in respecting all religions, and the state agreeing to respect all religions. 

One thing People SAARC should do is to examine 60 years of Religious secularism in India. They should analyze history taught in schools and other state institutions on how much influence religion has. 

As civil society we should monitor human rights, particularly minority groups. World over, including US, minority groups are discriminated. We need to create a body that would address minority groups’ human rights violations. The commission should have powers to investigate and report on complaints lodged. E.g. Romanian Commission on Equal Opportunity. If individuals are discriminated they must be brought to justice. 

SAARC should monitor equal rights.

Kashmir

Serious concern on Islamic movement and international propaganda. 

The political movement in Kashmir: Does it reflect the Islamic movement? 

In South Asia we tend to focus more on religion conflicts vs. other conflicts. 

In India more people are being pushed into religious extremists, not as much spiritual but politically driven. 

Covert Communalism is on the rise. After bombs no riots take place however the division amongst people is growing. The division amongst Hindus and Muslims has grown immensely over the last few years. 

What will happen when communities divide? Civil war is probable.

Problems to recognizing minority rights;
1. Christians in India own certain top institutions. When violence breaks out, the Christians show preference to the elite, Brahmin etc. they exclude low caste. However, they fight for minority rights. Contradiction of viewpoints. 

Comments

1. Way to sabotage the terrorist who act in the name of religions is to not allow this division to take place. 
E.g. during security checks let Muslims be a part of the check, assuring the people of their safety. 

2. We should demand for secularism in SAARC, create minority commissions to safeguard rights. 

3. We need to work at SAARC level as countries normally don’t like displaced people. ‘People of no where’

4. “If you are not making justice for the just, then you are not making justice” we are here to explore peace through dialogue. 

5. In Pakistan if Hindu says few words against Holy Prophet he might be killed by police or prison mates or hung. This is the law that does not ‘tolerate’ the minority. Hence we must not say minority – we must guard our future.

6. Fundamentalists and extremism are fairly new to this region. We must consider the foreign influence. 

7. Nationalism and religion have incorporated itself to the government. In Sri Lanka there are problems within Sinhalese and Tamil, Buddhists and Christians. We have many religions but dominant people are pushing for a sovereign Buddhist nation. If NE conflict is resolved, we might have a religious conflict. Christians, Muslims and Hindus are oppressed. Many churches are being burnt. Government is turning a blind eye. However Buddhist parties (Sinhala Urumaya) and Prime Minister endorse a sovereign Buddhist country. 

8. We should have a visa free SAARC – many are detained on invalid visa grounds. 

Demands to SAARC Governments

1. Religion should be separate from state

2. All blasphemy laws should be abolished

3. Non discriminative education system – all public institutions should include minority curriculums

4. Sri Lankan government to be questioned about the promotion of a Buddhist sovereign nation

5. Persecution of minorities should be stopped

6. The state should be given a reporting system – record incidents etc. 

7. Positive enforcement of all communities 

8. These all represent breakdown in democracy 

9. Differences in religion should be addressed

10. Minority rights are symptoms to bigger issues which should be resolved

11. Establish SAARC Human Rights forum, a powerful creation of a minority groups that look into rights of religions with 50% female involvement

12. Given the history of riots, in all SAARC countries, there should be speedy honorable compensation made to the individuals

13. Special courts to bring speedy action so that justice will be brought to court

14. Government should be held responsible ad accountable]]> http://peoplespacesl.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=21 Tue, 30 Mar 2010 05:13:23 -0400 http://peoplespacesl.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=21
During this session, there were many issues discussed, regarding the people groups in South East Asia. Most speakers being from India, the main focus was on how the people in India and Pakistan handle the idea of a “union” consisting of the “people” in South Asia who will run the region exclusively, without an interest in the specific governments. One of the speakers, Mr. Karamath explained how most of the people, the masses of this region are not happy with their individual government systems and how the people should either be invaded by outsiders and the system changed, or the people of the nations invade the system for a better tomorrow. However, he also went to explain how invasion of a completely different State would not help the community but destroy it. Thus, explaining the only option of a people’s union which will take control of the region and create a lasting and productive change.

Most speakers including, Mr. Karamath, Mr. Kuldeep Naiyer, Mr. Kamal Mithai Chenai and others, agreed on the need for a South Asian People’s Union which will be powered by the people and not the State. This was the main form of alternative which was discussed. Though there were a few participants who objected because of the enormity of the project, most others thought it a possibility to begin such a “union”. 
There were many different guidelines and plans that were discussed, which needed implementation in the near future, due to their unanimous thought that “the time for change is now”. Thus, there were various suggestions by all participants and speakers as to how this “union” could be formed.

According to Mr. Karamath, initially, the people of the region need to be free from the burdens of “militarization and ideology”. According to him, minorities such as women and the working masses are down trodden and burdened by the ideological approaches of the State and also their control by nationalism. Forming a “union” which will be people centered and powered by people, will humanize the “State”, he said. According to him, expenditure of the State could easily be reduced and poverty rates reduced, if the people could be free from militarization and ideologies. 

Fighting for the rights of the working class and implementing a free visa system, making it possible for all to travel among the nations with no difficulty and freely, will make the region a friendlier and united one, was the belief of many. According to him, people should be able to “move freely and plan things together” in order to bring unity in the region.

According to Mr. Kuldeep Naiyer there are two main plans that need to be implemented. Firstly a “no-war pact”. According to him, the regional countries should get into a no war pact which will instantly help reduce poverty rates. The war is the main crisis which leaves room for poverty, hunger and starvation he said. Thus, having a “no war pact” would instantly help the people live a better life. The second plan was a solution to the economic problem. According to him, if India agrees to selling their products at the buying rate to the regional countries and also sharing technology, people in the region will have a better view of India and also be harmonious. This plan according to him would make India, a “developed nation” comparatively to the other South Asian nations, could help develop these “developing countries”, in the same way Europe and USA fund and help Asia.

Another of his sub plans mentioned was the ability to change the hostility between the young people by changing the text books in school. According to him, the youth of the region do not have a clear vision of the future and need to be taught the history of the regional countries. The youth he said, need to be educated and taught the value of care and concern for South Asia, giving them clear vision of the future and past. According to Mr. Naiyer, changing the text books and in school and creating awareness in schools will be of greater benefit than changing the minds of adults.

According to Mr. Chenai, systematically planned steps need to be taken and initiated by the people in order to implement unity in the region. All countries involved in the region need to analyze their individual security plans and together plan and carry out a safe security system across the region, allowing people to feel one with others. 

Another main point raised was the need to make the public, aware of the “union” and get all types of people groups involved so that it would mean the same to all groups in all countries equally. Getting the youth involved is another one of the main points highlighted because of the reducing rates of young people who are involved in activism.
Apart from these plans, a union for farmers is another plan that needs to be implemented because of the hunger crisis which most of the people in the region are facing, said a participant. Thus, using this strategy and getting a huge mass of people involved, will help bring about unity and harmony among the region was admitted by many.

Apart from all these strategic plans, the main thing needed was “equality” among the people, in spite of gender, cast, race, religion or status, which will make all humans treat each other with respect and have care for diversity. According to most others, it was clarified that the need for unity and equality for all people in the region will be possible through a “union” which will be “people centered” and “people powered” and not by any other form of plan. Thus, the session came to and end.]]>
During this session, there were many issues discussed, regarding the people groups in South East Asia. Most speakers being from India, the main focus was on how the people in India and Pakistan handle the idea of a “union” consisting of the “people” in South Asia who will run the region exclusively, without an interest in the specific governments. One of the speakers, Mr. Karamath explained how most of the people, the masses of this region are not happy with their individual government systems and how the people should either be invaded by outsiders and the system changed, or the people of the nations invade the system for a better tomorrow. However, he also went to explain how invasion of a completely different State would not help the community but destroy it. Thus, explaining the only option of a people’s union which will take control of the region and create a lasting and productive change.

Most speakers including, Mr. Karamath, Mr. Kuldeep Naiyer, Mr. Kamal Mithai Chenai and others, agreed on the need for a South Asian People’s Union which will be powered by the people and not the State. This was the main form of alternative which was discussed. Though there were a few participants who objected because of the enormity of the project, most others thought it a possibility to begin such a “union”. 
There were many different guidelines and plans that were discussed, which needed implementation in the near future, due to their unanimous thought that “the time for change is now”. Thus, there were various suggestions by all participants and speakers as to how this “union” could be formed.

According to Mr. Karamath, initially, the people of the region need to be free from the burdens of “militarization and ideology”. According to him, minorities such as women and the working masses are down trodden and burdened by the ideological approaches of the State and also their control by nationalism. Forming a “union” which will be people centered and powered by people, will humanize the “State”, he said. According to him, expenditure of the State could easily be reduced and poverty rates reduced, if the people could be free from militarization and ideologies. 

Fighting for the rights of the working class and implementing a free visa system, making it possible for all to travel among the nations with no difficulty and freely, will make the region a friendlier and united one, was the belief of many. According to him, people should be able to “move freely and plan things together” in order to bring unity in the region.

According to Mr. Kuldeep Naiyer there are two main plans that need to be implemented. Firstly a “no-war pact”. According to him, the regional countries should get into a no war pact which will instantly help reduce poverty rates. The war is the main crisis which leaves room for poverty, hunger and starvation he said. Thus, having a “no war pact” would instantly help the people live a better life. The second plan was a solution to the economic problem. According to him, if India agrees to selling their products at the buying rate to the regional countries and also sharing technology, people in the region will have a better view of India and also be harmonious. This plan according to him would make India, a “developed nation” comparatively to the other South Asian nations, could help develop these “developing countries”, in the same way Europe and USA fund and help Asia.

Another of his sub plans mentioned was the ability to change the hostility between the young people by changing the text books in school. According to him, the youth of the region do not have a clear vision of the future and need to be taught the history of the regional countries. The youth he said, need to be educated and taught the value of care and concern for South Asia, giving them clear vision of the future and past. According to Mr. Naiyer, changing the text books and in school and creating awareness in schools will be of greater benefit than changing the minds of adults.

According to Mr. Chenai, systematically planned steps need to be taken and initiated by the people in order to implement unity in the region. All countries involved in the region need to analyze their individual security plans and together plan and carry out a safe security system across the region, allowing people to feel one with others. 

Another main point raised was the need to make the public, aware of the “union” and get all types of people groups involved so that it would mean the same to all groups in all countries equally. Getting the youth involved is another one of the main points highlighted because of the reducing rates of young people who are involved in activism.
Apart from these plans, a union for farmers is another plan that needs to be implemented because of the hunger crisis which most of the people in the region are facing, said a participant. Thus, using this strategy and getting a huge mass of people involved, will help bring about unity and harmony among the region was admitted by many.

Apart from all these strategic plans, the main thing needed was “equality” among the people, in spite of gender, cast, race, religion or status, which will make all humans treat each other with respect and have care for diversity. According to most others, it was clarified that the need for unity and equality for all people in the region will be possible through a “union” which will be “people centered” and “people powered” and not by any other form of plan. Thus, the session came to and end.]]> http://peoplespacesl.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=20 Tue, 30 Mar 2010 05:12:51 -0400 http://peoplespacesl.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=20 Resource person- Mr. Pakiajothy Sarawanamuttu

Participants- 29 at starting
12at finishing

Started Time- 2.30 pm

Activities-

Mr. Saravanamuttu started the dialogue for sharing experiences about IDPs (internally displaced persons).
Saroja spoke about her experiences. She was internally displaced several times in Jaffna, Sri Lanka. She is a Tamil lady. She spoke 15 minutes.
Nihamaththulla, who is a Muslim, spoke about his first hand experiences about being internally displaced in Ampara. He spoke about people’s unity with positive attitude and about Refugee camps with negative attitude. 
Majitha, she is Sri Lankan lawyer, spoke about the difficulties which IDPs have to undergo such as education, transport, health, check points.
One person stood up from audience. He came from India. He is helping feed Sri Lankans who are now displaced in India.
One lady stood up and she was speaking about Indian IDPs. She came from India.
Another person stood up, he came from Bangladesh. He spoke about displaced people in Bangladesh and their difficulties.
One Sri Lankan person stood up and he spoke about Mannar and Sri Lankan IDPs. He spoke very emotionally.
Another lady stood up from audience and she came from India. She spoke about her own experiences about IDPs in South Asia.
Another speaker from Sri Lanka, Mannar. He spoke about “guiding principles of Sri Lankan government”.
Mr. Saravanamuttu spoke about “long time protection for IDP’ and Refugees in South Asia.” It became a discussion and the entire audience participated.

Achievements-
Mr. Saravanamuttu was very education in his discussion and it was a good dialogue.

Difficulties- 
• Other loudspeaker’s sound
• Very noisy environment

Ended time- 3.45 pm

Reported by- Gayathri.]]> Resource person- Mr. Pakiajothy Sarawanamuttu

Participants- 29 at starting
12at finishing

Started Time- 2.30 pm

Activities-

Mr. Saravanamuttu started the dialogue for sharing experiences about IDPs (internally displaced persons).
Saroja spoke about her experiences. She was internally displaced several times in Jaffna, Sri Lanka. She is a Tamil lady. She spoke 15 minutes.
Nihamaththulla, who is a Muslim, spoke about his first hand experiences about being internally displaced in Ampara. He spoke about people’s unity with positive attitude and about Refugee camps with negative attitude. 
Majitha, she is Sri Lankan lawyer, spoke about the difficulties which IDPs have to undergo such as education, transport, health, check points.
One person stood up from audience. He came from India. He is helping feed Sri Lankans who are now displaced in India.
One lady stood up and she was speaking about Indian IDPs. She came from India.
Another person stood up, he came from Bangladesh. He spoke about displaced people in Bangladesh and their difficulties.
One Sri Lankan person stood up and he spoke about Mannar and Sri Lankan IDPs. He spoke very emotionally.
Another lady stood up from audience and she came from India. She spoke about her own experiences about IDPs in South Asia.
Another speaker from Sri Lanka, Mannar. He spoke about “guiding principles of Sri Lankan government”.
Mr. Saravanamuttu spoke about “long time protection for IDP’ and Refugees in South Asia.” It became a discussion and the entire audience participated.

Achievements-
Mr. Saravanamuttu was very education in his discussion and it was a good dialogue.

Difficulties- 
• Other loudspeaker’s sound
• Very noisy environment

Ended time- 3.45 pm

Reported by- Gayathri.]]> http://peoplespacesl.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=19 Tue, 30 Mar 2010 05:12:19 -0400 http://peoplespacesl.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=19
For the Declaration:
1. Institutionalisation of the problems caused by climate changes by the National governments, the SAARC and other regional coalitions so that they are able to discuss the issue, formulate an action plan and work towards its implementation at the collective regional level.
2. The national governments of the South Asian countries and the SAARC should not forget the main victims of changes in the climate and resultant disasters which are the poor and marginalised communities of this region. The former should recognise them as both victims and solution providers for the issue. 
3. Special focus should be placed on women and children, addressing their specific vulnerabilities as they are directly and worst affected by disasters as a result of climate change.
4. The SAARC should put pressure on the South Asian governments to honour the Kyoto Protocol
5. The governments together and collectively in the SAARC should ensure food security in the region by:
a. Focussing on agricultural production rather than bio-fuel production
b. Endorsing proposals for agricultural adaptation to climate change, for e.g.: Dry Land Agriculture, production of millets etc
c. Opposing multinationals that produce GM seeds and market them in the developing South
d. Put a stop to all inorganic chemical farming as it pollutes groundwater and thus adds to changes in the climate
6. Regulation of industries responsible for high carbon emissions
7. Special focus should be given to marginalised communities who earn their livelihood by fishing as they are directly affected by rising sea waters and sea erosion in all of South Asian
8. Development, heavy investment and promotion of renewable energy as an alternative to fossil fuels
9. Speculation in carbon funds should be curtailed and the money be diverted for urgent and basic needs of the people of the region. 
10. Mitigation techniques has to be focussed upon:
a. Common and differentiated responsibilities
b. A carbon tax should be placed on polluters
c. Mainstreaming adaptation into all plans and schemes put into operation by the governments in their countries and at the regional level as the SAARC
11. Commit resources towards technology and tools for climate change mitigation and adaptation
12. Last but not the least the People’s voices cannot be ignored in their capacity to put pressure on their governments, and therefore, misinformation on the issue has to be stopped through the used of appropriate community media and simplified messages in local languages
The Workshop Proceedings:

• The Climate Change Perspective in South Asia (Sanjay Vashist)
------

• CC and livelihood (K. S. Gopal)
1. Livelihoods are affected by inter related aspects of economy, society, culture and politics- and these collectively affect the changes in the climate and have to be seen in that respect- environmental changes becomes an overarching issue in all of these
2. Disaster management plans of action should not serve as mitigation techniques
3. The managers of CC (as they are) is more about branding the issue rather than actually doing anything about it
4. The entire discourse on livelihood needs to be examined and thus automatically look at climate change as an inherent aspect

• CC and Food Security (Sanjay Rai):
1. Production of food grains is highly affected by CC and GM crops is just not the right solution to the problem
2. Minimum support price which is beneficial to the middle class peasants and farmers etc is also affecting the food situation, these farmers are also the ones that use MNC support and hence, pressure on the land and farming techniques and thus leading to changes in the climate
3. Disasters have also to be looked as it is a result of CC and very directly affects the food availability and quality questions

• CC and ICTs (Geetha Bhardwaj):
1. Dearth of grassroot voices articulating their issues and concerns on climate change as they are most affected along with scientists who are talking about why such phenomenon are occurring 
2. Do we have to follow the paradigm of development in the North
3. Promotion of community media, technologies that suit the media so that awareness can be generated on the issue- to also network, communicate, advocate on the issue

• CC and Women (Sriyani Perera):
1. Tagging women with disasters and violence
2. Women are most vulnerable in situations of disasters as a result of CC
3. Women and their access to health, food, is increasingly being affected because of changes in climate and the disasters therefore

• CC and the coastal folk (S. M. Prithivraj):
1. We should follow the basic ecological principle of everything is connected to everything
2. Frequent changes in climate affect the coastal areas
3. Most of the people in the coastal areas are from tribal and dalit backgrounds and this structure in itself affects their access to situations which gets heightened with changes in the climate

• CC and Bangladesh
1. Poor people in plenty in the nation- specially those living near the river- and are constantly being displaced
2. the government also though aware of the situation, but do not do anything about the situation- they keep shifting from one bank to another- hence, basic facilities like school, health, etc are a distant dream
3. the land is less- and poor people many- vulnerability of women and children, cattle, etc is high
4. women- occupation and mobility is an issue as there are less opportunities in disaster prone areas

• CC and SL- Energy forum - Asoka A.
1. Adaptation is being discussed as there are no other concrete solutions available
2. Are we ready to think about a world without fossil fuels?? Do we want to emit more carbon dioxide??
3. The developed has already finished on their own and the developing world’s quota on pollution
4. Learning from the poor, marginalised, etc is the key as that is where the low carbon economy exists
5. The governments in the South do have money for fossil fuels but they do not have money for renewable energy sources

• CC and the environment – Sri Lanka- Hemanta Withanage
1. floods and disasters in south asia have increased to a large extent and directly related to CC
2. the common people affected actually do not know why this happening- melting of glaciers, etc, developed country’s role is not known to them, tourists in regions like Maldives, SL- are they the reason for the changes occurring
3. governance of CC- who is deciding on all of these- Shell example in SL- affecting the coastlines, but now scientists are more clear on why this is occurring
4. G8, Bali have already discussed cuts in emissions- China and India have refused to the limits as they are aware of the actual role of the developed countries; 
5. SAARC ministers met in July and shared information about disasters and serves as a beginning of doing something in the region about the issue
6. SL and the Carbon Fund as sources of investment- clean development mechanism, is this money serving the interests of the big industries so that they can speculate in carbon trade?? But what about the common people??
7. Civil society education and awareness on adaptation and reasons etc is most important. The experts are the common people and not the governments- that is what one should focus on- local community support is highly essential.

• Comments and Responses
a. Himanshu - debate revolved around why CC has occurred and the debate has turned into a blame game; missing aspect is governance, accountability and institutionalising the problem of CC- in each country (draft plan on CC), civil society’s role in holding governments accountable; etc
b. PSSF – chemical fertilisers, water pollution, environmental changes in other areas affect the nearby regions; people’s movements, NGOs do not focus on environmental justice in particular and this needs to change; excluded people have to be brought forward to form a collective and an opinion
c. Dr. Velaram – works in tribal areas- hidden tribal values can provide a suggestion to the problem – minerals, forest, etc have been extracted from the Earth, we have totally molested nature, and hence, we are responsible for the situation that we are in today. We want to own nature at all levels and we have to stop consumption practises as they are so that we can stop the destruction that is occurring
d. Prof. Arjuna Desilva - Misrepresentation of women as reasons for disasters has to be stopped- naming of floods, disasters etc, misinformation has to be stopped so that people know exactly what has happened
e. Connection between CC and nuclear
f. Social aspects of CC- we cannot not talk about the poor as they are the one’s affected and the solutions should also come from them; they are the refugees of these climate changes, the woman is most affected as is a poor country
g. Sweeang – the use of GM crops as a mitigation technique for CC
h. A paradigm shift is required in terms of identifying reasons and impacts of CC is required.
i. Fisher folk in Sri Lanka- the area that they live in actually belongs to the environment and some thought on future possibilities of alternate livelihood need to be considered
j. Saharanpur - CC issue is raised at 2 levels- scientific and activist levels but the messages are not going down to the level of the people- if people put pressure on the government, then and only then can something be done
k. War leads to affecting forests, dropping of bombs, livelihoods of the common people and this is related to changes in the climate too]]>
For the Declaration:
1. Institutionalisation of the problems caused by climate changes by the National governments, the SAARC and other regional coalitions so that they are able to discuss the issue, formulate an action plan and work towards its implementation at the collective regional level.
2. The national governments of the South Asian countries and the SAARC should not forget the main victims of changes in the climate and resultant disasters which are the poor and marginalised communities of this region. The former should recognise them as both victims and solution providers for the issue. 
3. Special focus should be placed on women and children, addressing their specific vulnerabilities as they are directly and worst affected by disasters as a result of climate change.
4. The SAARC should put pressure on the South Asian governments to honour the Kyoto Protocol
5. The governments together and collectively in the SAARC should ensure food security in the region by:
a. Focussing on agricultural production rather than bio-fuel production
b. Endorsing proposals for agricultural adaptation to climate change, for e.g.: Dry Land Agriculture, production of millets etc
c. Opposing multinationals that produce GM seeds and market them in the developing South
d. Put a stop to all inorganic chemical farming as it pollutes groundwater and thus adds to changes in the climate
6. Regulation of industries responsible for high carbon emissions
7. Special focus should be given to marginalised communities who earn their livelihood by fishing as they are directly affected by rising sea waters and sea erosion in all of South Asian
8. Development, heavy investment and promotion of renewable energy as an alternative to fossil fuels
9. Speculation in carbon funds should be curtailed and the money be diverted for urgent and basic needs of the people of the region. 
10. Mitigation techniques has to be focussed upon:
a. Common and differentiated responsibilities
b. A carbon tax should be placed on polluters
c. Mainstreaming adaptation into all plans and schemes put into operation by the governments in their countries and at the regional level as the SAARC
11. Commit resources towards technology and tools for climate change mitigation and adaptation
12. Last but not the least the People’s voices cannot be ignored in their capacity to put pressure on their governments, and therefore, misinformation on the issue has to be stopped through the used of appropriate community media and simplified messages in local languages
The Workshop Proceedings:

• The Climate Change Perspective in South Asia (Sanjay Vashist)
------

• CC and livelihood (K. S. Gopal)
1. Livelihoods are affected by inter related aspects of economy, society, culture and politics- and these collectively affect the changes in the climate and have to be seen in that respect- environmental changes becomes an overarching issue in all of these
2. Disaster management plans of action should not serve as mitigation techniques
3. The managers of CC (as they are) is more about branding the issue rather than actually doing anything about it
4. The entire discourse on livelihood needs to be examined and thus automatically look at climate change as an inherent aspect

• CC and Food Security (Sanjay Rai):
1. Production of food grains is highly affected by CC and GM crops is just not the right solution to the problem
2. Minimum support price which is beneficial to the middle class peasants and farmers etc is also affecting the food situation, these farmers are also the ones that use MNC support and hence, pressure on the land and farming techniques and thus leading to changes in the climate
3. Disasters have also to be looked as it is a result of CC and very directly affects the food availability and quality questions

• CC and ICTs (Geetha Bhardwaj):
1. Dearth of grassroot voices articulating their issues and concerns on climate change as they are most affected along with scientists who are talking about why such phenomenon are occurring 
2. Do we have to follow the paradigm of development in the North
3. Promotion of community media, technologies that suit the media so that awareness can be generated on the issue- to also network, communicate, advocate on the issue

• CC and Women (Sriyani Perera):
1. Tagging women with disasters and violence
2. Women are most vulnerable in situations of disasters as a result of CC
3. Women and their access to health, food, is increasingly being affected because of changes in climate and the disasters therefore

• CC and the coastal folk (S. M. Prithivraj):
1. We should follow the basic ecological principle of everything is connected to everything
2. Frequent changes in climate affect the coastal areas
3. Most of the people in the coastal areas are from tribal and dalit backgrounds and this structure in itself affects their access to situations which gets heightened with changes in the climate

• CC and Bangladesh
1. Poor people in plenty in the nation- specially those living near the river- and are constantly being displaced
2. the government also though aware of the situation, but do not do anything about the situation- they keep shifting from one bank to another- hence, basic facilities like school, health, etc are a distant dream
3. the land is less- and poor people many- vulnerability of women and children, cattle, etc is high
4. women- occupation and mobility is an issue as there are less opportunities in disaster prone areas

• CC and SL- Energy forum - Asoka A.
1. Adaptation is being discussed as there are no other concrete solutions available
2. Are we ready to think about a world without fossil fuels?? Do we want to emit more carbon dioxide??
3. The developed has already finished on their own and the developing world’s quota on pollution
4. Learning from the poor, marginalised, etc is the key as that is where the low carbon economy exists
5. The governments in the South do have money for fossil fuels but they do not have money for renewable energy sources

• CC and the environment – Sri Lanka- Hemanta Withanage
1. floods and disasters in south asia have increased to a large extent and directly related to CC
2. the common people affected actually do not know why this happening- melting of glaciers, etc, developed country’s role is not known to them, tourists in regions like Maldives, SL- are they the reason for the changes occurring
3. governance of CC- who is deciding on all of these- Shell example in SL- affecting the coastlines, but now scientists are more clear on why this is occurring
4. G8, Bali have already discussed cuts in emissions- China and India have refused to the limits as they are aware of the actual role of the developed countries; 
5. SAARC ministers met in July and shared information about disasters and serves as a beginning of doing something in the region about the issue
6. SL and the Carbon Fund as sources of investment- clean development mechanism, is this money serving the interests of the big industries so that they can speculate in carbon trade?? But what about the common people??
7. Civil society education and awareness on adaptation and reasons etc is most important. The experts are the common people and not the governments- that is what one should focus on- local community support is highly essential.

• Comments and Responses
a. Himanshu - debate revolved around why CC has occurred and the debate has turned into a blame game; missing aspect is governance, accountability and institutionalising the problem of CC- in each country (draft plan on CC), civil society’s role in holding governments accountable; etc
b. PSSF – chemical fertilisers, water pollution, environmental changes in other areas affect the nearby regions; people’s movements, NGOs do not focus on environmental justice in particular and this needs to change; excluded people have to be brought forward to form a collective and an opinion
c. Dr. Velaram – works in tribal areas- hidden tribal values can provide a suggestion to the problem – minerals, forest, etc have been extracted from the Earth, we have totally molested nature, and hence, we are responsible for the situation that we are in today. We want to own nature at all levels and we have to stop consumption practises as they are so that we can stop the destruction that is occurring
d. Prof. Arjuna Desilva - Misrepresentation of women as reasons for disasters has to be stopped- naming of floods, disasters etc, misinformation has to be stopped so that people know exactly what has happened
e. Connection between CC and nuclear
f. Social aspects of CC- we cannot not talk about the poor as they are the one’s affected and the solutions should also come from them; they are the refugees of these climate changes, the woman is most affected as is a poor country
g. Sweeang – the use of GM crops as a mitigation technique for CC
h. A paradigm shift is required in terms of identifying reasons and impacts of CC is required.
i. Fisher folk in Sri Lanka- the area that they live in actually belongs to the environment and some thought on future possibilities of alternate livelihood need to be considered
j. Saharanpur - CC issue is raised at 2 levels- scientific and activist levels but the messages are not going down to the level of the people- if people put pressure on the government, then and only then can something be done
k. War leads to affecting forests, dropping of bombs, livelihoods of the common people and this is related to changes in the climate too]]> http://peoplespacesl.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=18 Tue, 30 Mar 2010 05:11:47 -0400 http://peoplespacesl.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=18
Speaking next was Mr.Karmat, a South Asian activist who is a member of the Pakistan and Indian people’s freedom 

“In South Asia, over 80% of people in these countries lives below the poverty line. This is a characteristic of a failed state. They have failed the past and the future generation,” he said.

He also said that questons on poverty cannot be resolved until the Indian and Pakistani conflict is resolved.

“In 2004 when manmohan Singh took over, we asked him what will happen to the conflic and then he said that in two months tie he will come to Pakistan and he will then withdraw all army forces and promised to reduce funds for the war but later on the army chief of India told a different story saying that they cant withdraw the army forces,” he said. 

He also said that we only hear about democracy and have not seen it up to now. According to him, we cant imagine ourselves as free citizens as we have enslaved oursleves willingly and that people don’t have to beg for rights that have been enshrined in the Human Rights declaration. There has to be a mechanism that has to be recognize these violations. 

“We have to make the state subsurvient in order for the state to serve the people better. Our nations are ruled by incompeten and illieterate leaders, who’s families had served the British when they were ruling the country and not giving the ordinary people to come up,” he said. 

He also said that all states have to de-neutralize and de-milliterize and reject the idea of national security and instead focus on security for the people.]]>
Speaking next was Mr.Karmat, a South Asian activist who is a member of the Pakistan and Indian people’s freedom 

“In South Asia, over 80% of people in these countries lives below the poverty line. This is a characteristic of a failed state. They have failed the past and the future generation,” he said.

He also said that questons on poverty cannot be resolved until the Indian and Pakistani conflict is resolved.

“In 2004 when manmohan Singh took over, we asked him what will happen to the conflic and then he said that in two months tie he will come to Pakistan and he will then withdraw all army forces and promised to reduce funds for the war but later on the army chief of India told a different story saying that they cant withdraw the army forces,” he said. 

He also said that we only hear about democracy and have not seen it up to now. According to him, we cant imagine ourselves as free citizens as we have enslaved oursleves willingly and that people don’t have to beg for rights that have been enshrined in the Human Rights declaration. There has to be a mechanism that has to be recognize these violations. 

“We have to make the state subsurvient in order for the state to serve the people better. Our nations are ruled by incompeten and illieterate leaders, who’s families had served the British when they were ruling the country and not giving the ordinary people to come up,” he said. 

He also said that all states have to de-neutralize and de-milliterize and reject the idea of national security and instead focus on security for the people.]]> http://peoplespacesl.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=17 Tue, 30 Mar 2010 05:10:54 -0400 http://peoplespacesl.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=17
Anis Rahman from Bangladesh briefly described the situation in his country, and wanted the regional countries to put in place the framework to implement the following suggestions. 

1. Comprehensive regional Policy.
2. The Right to Work
3. Ratify the UN Convention on Migration 1990.
4. Have a Regional Data Base on Migrants.
5. Establish a Task Force to Combat Human Trafficking.
6. Have a Common Code of Conduct.
7. Ensure Minimum Wages.

Sister Valarmathy from Tamil Nadu said that in India, domestic workers are not recognized as workers. Therefore they don't enjoy the rights enjoyed by the other workers. Children are taken from Rural areas and Auctioned in the State of Kerala, paid a monthly wage of Rs. 500.00. Their parents get an initial payment of Rs. 2,000.00 and thereafter they won't be able to contact their children. Although the child Labour is banned is increasing. Women workers who have migrated to other countries are also exploited. 

Mr. Jeevanand from India stated that there are some 20 million workers who migrate internally in India. These Internal Migrant workers have the following problems.

1. Since they are not literate and also not able to communicate in the language that is spoken in the state, they face problems.
2. They lack Basic Facilities; Safety aspects of the workplace are neglected. 
3. No Social Security. 
4. No Basic Documents to prove their identity therefore facilities are denied to them. 
5. Child Labour – Trafficking. 

A Professor from Delhi gave the bigger picture of the migration fro Colonial times that led to the demographic distortion.

Muthuraman fro Sri Lanka spoke about the denial of Citizenship to the Plantation Workers who migrated from India.
Internal Migration from the plantations to the urban areas to seek better jobs is hampered by the constant checking by the Security Forces due to the prevailing situation in the country.

During this discussion it was said that although as a region SAARC countries are the biggest suppliers of Migrant Workers and their share of the GDP is very high. They do not benefit much from their labour due to the lack of avenues fro investing their earnings in their own countries.

Recommendation made in this workshop.
1. Migrant workers have a right to information.
2. No worker should be called illegal worker, rather they must be called undocumented workers.
3. Like ASEAN the SAARC countries also should have common labour policy
4. Domestic work must be recognized as work.
5. Control of Recruitment Agencies.
6. Change in the demography due to Internal Migration and the tension between the Migrant population and the indigenous population must be addressed.
7. Concerted effort must be made by the regional countries as one to create investment opportunities for the Migrant Workers.]]>
Anis Rahman from Bangladesh briefly described the situation in his country, and wanted the regional countries to put in place the framework to implement the following suggestions. 

1. Comprehensive regional Policy.
2. The Right to Work
3. Ratify the UN Convention on Migration 1990.
4. Have a Regional Data Base on Migrants.
5. Establish a Task Force to Combat Human Trafficking.
6. Have a Common Code of Conduct.
7. Ensure Minimum Wages.

Sister Valarmathy from Tamil Nadu said that in India, domestic workers are not recognized as workers. Therefore they don't enjoy the rights enjoyed by the other workers. Children are taken from Rural areas and Auctioned in the State of Kerala, paid a monthly wage of Rs. 500.00. Their parents get an initial payment of Rs. 2,000.00 and thereafter they won't be able to contact their children. Although the child Labour is banned is increasing. Women workers who have migrated to other countries are also exploited. 

Mr. Jeevanand from India stated that there are some 20 million workers who migrate internally in India. These Internal Migrant workers have the following problems.

1. Since they are not literate and also not able to communicate in the language that is spoken in the state, they face problems.
2. They lack Basic Facilities; Safety aspects of the workplace are neglected. 
3. No Social Security. 
4. No Basic Documents to prove their identity therefore facilities are denied to them. 
5. Child Labour – Trafficking. 

A Professor from Delhi gave the bigger picture of the migration fro Colonial times that led to the demographic distortion.

Muthuraman fro Sri Lanka spoke about the denial of Citizenship to the Plantation Workers who migrated from India.
Internal Migration from the plantations to the urban areas to seek better jobs is hampered by the constant checking by the Security Forces due to the prevailing situation in the country.

During this discussion it was said that although as a region SAARC countries are the biggest suppliers of Migrant Workers and their share of the GDP is very high. They do not benefit much from their labour due to the lack of avenues fro investing their earnings in their own countries.

Recommendation made in this workshop.
1. Migrant workers have a right to information.
2. No worker should be called illegal worker, rather they must be called undocumented workers.
3. Like ASEAN the SAARC countries also should have common labour policy
4. Domestic work must be recognized as work.
5. Control of Recruitment Agencies.
6. Change in the demography due to Internal Migration and the tension between the Migrant population and the indigenous population must be addressed.
7. Concerted effort must be made by the regional countries as one to create investment opportunities for the Migrant Workers.]]> http://peoplespacesl.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=16 Tue, 30 Mar 2010 05:10:25 -0400 http://peoplespacesl.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=16 • Mr Narendra Gupta- representative of People’s Health Movement, public health activist (India)
• Mr Abhijeet Das- representative of Men’s Action for Stopping Violence Against Women (MASVAW), and gender and health activist (India)
• Mr Firazul –activist working with women and children (Bangladesh)
• Mr Subhash- works in the area of gender and government (North India)



Several issues pertaining to the area of men, the social perception of masculinity and the part men play in GBV were discussed. 

An introductory statement was given by Mr Gupta, who outlined the paradoxical postion of women in Asian societies (SAARC region). According to him, women seem to be glorified and kept on a pedestal, but within the framework of interpersonal relationships they are victims of sexual and domestic abuse. The man-woman relationship should be viewed on grounds of equality.

Mr Subhash next outlined three presumptions which he believed were the defining features of masculinity and GBV. They were-
• Men and women are not homogenous entities
• Violence is not hereditary and is therefore not passed on from generation to generation
• All men and women are not peace worshippers 

Violence is a symbol of power that seems to be synonymous with notions of masculinity, abuse of power and priviledges. On the contrary, women are viewed as being timid, and thus socio-economically handicapped. This social construction makes it conducive for men to unduly exert power over women, and to further consider it an unquestionable priviledge. There has to be an active involvment on the part of all concerned to unbind the fetters that seem to choke this system and thus suppress women. He further raised the question of whether this sort of climate would create a backlash and the role of women’s groups working in this endeavour. In order to create equality of sexes, men have to be willing to relegate their privileges in order for the sexes to be in a state of equilibrium. This automatically means that they assume a position of reduced power where the environment is not as conducive for abusing women. He raised the vital question of whether men, specially in patriachal societies are willing and prepared to do away with their positions of power. 
Furthermore, he stated that the period of neo-liberalism meant that the women were subjugated by the men, whereas post liberalism turned the tables around, causing women to assume more social and familial roles. This role reversal, which occurred not only in the familial and social contexts caused insecurities among men as they were now forced to view women as beings capable of managing their own destiny. This brings with it added considerations, mainly the coping mechanisms available for men to deal with their insecurities, what sort of pressure women now face in their new roles, and how this whole situation could be understood within the framework of the emerging socio-economic norms. 

A speaker in the audience brought the issue of the caste system into focus and stated that the caste system is intrisically linked to issues of men, masculinity and GBV. Countering some facts put forward by Mr Subhash, the speaker stated that this issue should not be looked at from the point of affecting the self esteem of men. It should instead be considered from the vantage point of women, and the psychological and physical harm inflicted upon them. The situation of the Dalits in India was used to illustrate this point as the women are the main breadwinners in this community while the men assume a backseat in most household chores. Men in most Asian societies seem to squandor the hard earned wages of their wives/sisters/and mothers while in turn subjecting them to abuse. 

According to Mr Abhijeet Das the South Asian region is considered to be rather violent, thus, violence cannot be viewed as being gender based. It occurs even within genders, where men fight with men. Violence, withing the South Asian region takes on many forms. But whatever the root cause of violence, an intrinsic feature of it is that it thrives on the notion of being socially sanctioned. Men seem to lash out when they feel that their power and priviledges are threatened. He also reiterated patriachy an intrinsic part of this issue. 
The oppressed find it easier to make demands of power when in a lesser position. 
Equality and respect for diversity is important. 
There has to be respect for those in lesser positions. 
The present caste system,social, economic and cultural reforms have to be re-examined. 

He posed the question of who defines the boundaries of autonomy. Where does paternalism end and autonomy begin?


A 15 minute film was then screened outlining the work done by the MASVAW in Uttar Pradesh which has a strong patriachal society. 

Later, Mr Firozul focused on the issue in relation to Bangladesh. He stated that violence is a heavily loaded term, and should be viewed from a psychological, economic, social, sexual and physical stance. 
Men are the cause of gender based violence, thus men have to be actively involved in bringing an end to this situation. He went on to state that a major challenge is the lack of policy initiative in the public sector. 




The floor was then opened for discussion-
• The issue of women’s rights directly challenges those in positions of power. Religious and cultural notions are usually used as a safety cushion, specially in the South Asian community when referring to issues of GBV and women’s rights. There is a mixing up of the interpretations, which means that the public have a different interpretation of the issue at hand. Religious connotations are weaved into social issues, and in the Asian culture, people are more likely to listen to religious scholars than activists. 
• The issue of priviledge and power are extremely context specific. Women should be more active and should come together in a bigger movement in order to increase visibility of their difficulties and the gender based issues. Men on the other hand should also join in the force, and should learn to treat women with due respect.
• “Kilapath” losely refers to equality and an egalitarian approach to life.
• Patriachy is solely a mythical concept. Thus, these myths should be dispelled.
• Women have an uphill journey in trying to convice men in power of the notion of equality, hence giving up privileges.
• Ms Bina Pradha an activist from Nepal commented that the genesis of masculinity and power should be closely scrutinized. There are health problems associated with the concept of masculinity which also need to be addressed. And finally, it is a public health priority issue.
• Mr Abhijeet Das added that men have to understand the intricasies of assuming power. That there is a cost associated with it, and that they have to understand their position in relation to women’s rights. collaboration of both the women’s and mens organizations is needed in order to bring about change. 
There are two kinds of policy alternatives-
1. National policy alternatives
2. South Asian policy alternatives- UNDP, WHO and the UN in genersl are active in working with men in this area.

• It is also essential that activists work with women in positions of power. 



The following recommendations were proposed for the convention-

1. Equality is favourable for all concerned. Innovotive strategies and approaches when working with men is necessary. This means that for example, the earlier notions of caste should be done away with. Mythical notions of patriachy should be dispelled. Its is imperative that work is done with both sexes while respecting their individual differences.
2. greater awareness must be created among women about the cultural and religious customs pertaining to women. for example the muslim divorce option ‘talaq’ being a right of the woman as well. they have a right for proper information.
3. current laws must be made gender sensitive.
4. men who assume positions of power should be sensitized.
5. women must be actively involved and included in the decision making process. 
6. the notion that masculinity is synonymous with power, privileges and subjugation of women must be dispelled.
7. the issue of sensitization must be considered within the broader framework of society and all its branches.
8. addressing gender equality alone is not enough, the imbalances caused by gender equity must also be considerd
9. education is a primary mode of empowerment, thus it should be used to its fullest capacity.
10. the notion that women are victims in this case, and the men the perpetraitors is an oversimplification of the whole situation. it must also be considered that sometimes women enjoy taking the back seat.]]> • Mr Narendra Gupta- representative of People’s Health Movement, public health activist (India)
• Mr Abhijeet Das- representative of Men’s Action for Stopping Violence Against Women (MASVAW), and gender and health activist (India)
• Mr Firazul –activist working with women and children (Bangladesh)
• Mr Subhash- works in the area of gender and government (North India)



Several issues pertaining to the area of men, the social perception of masculinity and the part men play in GBV were discussed. 

An introductory statement was given by Mr Gupta, who outlined the paradoxical postion of women in Asian societies (SAARC region). According to him, women seem to be glorified and kept on a pedestal, but within the framework of interpersonal relationships they are victims of sexual and domestic abuse. The man-woman relationship should be viewed on grounds of equality.

Mr Subhash next outlined three presumptions which he believed were the defining features of masculinity and GBV. They were-
• Men and women are not homogenous entities
• Violence is not hereditary and is therefore not passed on from generation to generation
• All men and women are not peace worshippers 

Violence is a symbol of power that seems to be synonymous with notions of masculinity, abuse of power and priviledges. On the contrary, women are viewed as being timid, and thus socio-economically handicapped. This social construction makes it conducive for men to unduly exert power over women, and to further consider it an unquestionable priviledge. There has to be an active involvment on the part of all concerned to unbind the fetters that seem to choke this system and thus suppress women. He further raised the question of whether this sort of climate would create a backlash and the role of women’s groups working in this endeavour. In order to create equality of sexes, men have to be willing to relegate their privileges in order for the sexes to be in a state of equilibrium. This automatically means that they assume a position of reduced power where the environment is not as conducive for abusing women. He raised the vital question of whether men, specially in patriachal societies are willing and prepared to do away with their positions of power. 
Furthermore, he stated that the period of neo-liberalism meant that the women were subjugated by the men, whereas post liberalism turned the tables around, causing women to assume more social and familial roles. This role reversal, which occurred not only in the familial and social contexts caused insecurities among men as they were now forced to view women as beings capable of managing their own destiny. This brings with it added considerations, mainly the coping mechanisms available for men to deal with their insecurities, what sort of pressure women now face in their new roles, and how this whole situation could be understood within the framework of the emerging socio-economic norms. 

A speaker in the audience brought the issue of the caste system into focus and stated that the caste system is intrisically linked to issues of men, masculinity and GBV. Countering some facts put forward by Mr Subhash, the speaker stated that this issue should not be looked at from the point of affecting the self esteem of men. It should instead be considered from the vantage point of women, and the psychological and physical harm inflicted upon them. The situation of the Dalits in India was used to illustrate this point as the women are the main breadwinners in this community while the men assume a backseat in most household chores. Men in most Asian societies seem to squandor the hard earned wages of their wives/sisters/and mothers while in turn subjecting them to abuse. 

According to Mr Abhijeet Das the South Asian region is considered to be rather violent, thus, violence cannot be viewed as being gender based. It occurs even within genders, where men fight with men. Violence, withing the South Asian region takes on many forms. But whatever the root cause of violence, an intrinsic feature of it is that it thrives on the notion of being socially sanctioned. Men seem to lash out when they feel that their power and priviledges are threatened. He also reiterated patriachy an intrinsic part of this issue. 
The oppressed find it easier to make demands of power when in a lesser position. 
Equality and respect for diversity is important. 
There has to be respect for those in lesser positions. 
The present caste system,social, economic and cultural reforms have to be re-examined. 

He posed the question of who defines the boundaries of autonomy. Where does paternalism end and autonomy begin?


A 15 minute film was then screened outlining the work done by the MASVAW in Uttar Pradesh which has a strong patriachal society. 

Later, Mr Firozul focused on the issue in relation to Bangladesh. He stated that violence is a heavily loaded term, and should be viewed from a psychological, economic, social, sexual and physical stance. 
Men are the cause of gender based violence, thus men have to be actively involved in bringing an end to this situation. He went on to state that a major challenge is the lack of policy initiative in the public sector. 




The floor was then opened for discussion-
• The issue of women’s rights directly challenges those in positions of power. Religious and cultural notions are usually used as a safety cushion, specially in the South Asian community when referring to issues of GBV and women’s rights. There is a mixing up of the interpretations, which means that the public have a different interpretation of the issue at hand. Religious connotations are weaved into social issues, and in the Asian culture, people are more likely to listen to religious scholars than activists. 
• The issue of priviledge and power are extremely context specific. Women should be more active and should come together in a bigger movement in order to increase visibility of their difficulties and the gender based issues. Men on the other hand should also join in the force, and should learn to treat women with due respect.
• “Kilapath” losely refers to equality and an egalitarian approach to life.
• Patriachy is solely a mythical concept. Thus, these myths should be dispelled.
• Women have an uphill journey in trying to convice men in power of the notion of equality, hence giving up privileges.
• Ms Bina Pradha an activist from Nepal commented that the genesis of masculinity and power should be closely scrutinized. There are health problems associated with the concept of masculinity which also need to be addressed. And finally, it is a public health priority issue.
• Mr Abhijeet Das added that men have to understand the intricasies of assuming power. That there is a cost associated with it, and that they have to understand their position in relation to women’s rights. collaboration of both the women’s and mens organizations is needed in order to bring about change. 
There are two kinds of policy alternatives-
1. National policy alternatives
2. South Asian policy alternatives- UNDP, WHO and the UN in genersl are active in working with men in this area.

• It is also essential that activists work with women in positions of power. 



The following recommendations were proposed for the convention-

1. Equality is favourable for all concerned. Innovotive strategies and approaches when working with men is necessary. This means that for example, the earlier notions of caste should be done away with. Mythical notions of patriachy should be dispelled. Its is imperative that work is done with both sexes while respecting their individual differences.
2. greater awareness must be created among women about the cultural and religious customs pertaining to women. for example the muslim divorce option ‘talaq’ being a right of the woman as well. they have a right for proper information.
3. current laws must be made gender sensitive.
4. men who assume positions of power should be sensitized.
5. women must be actively involved and included in the decision making process. 
6. the notion that masculinity is synonymous with power, privileges and subjugation of women must be dispelled.
7. the issue of sensitization must be considered within the broader framework of society and all its branches.
8. addressing gender equality alone is not enough, the imbalances caused by gender equity must also be considerd
9. education is a primary mode of empowerment, thus it should be used to its fullest capacity.
10. the notion that women are victims in this case, and the men the perpetraitors is an oversimplification of the whole situation. it must also be considered that sometimes women enjoy taking the back seat.]]> http://peoplespacesl.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=15 Tue, 30 Mar 2010 05:09:44 -0400 http://peoplespacesl.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=15
This session was conducted as a discussion by 11 delegates who were involved in media, journalism and the press. 

They discussed many issues faced by journalists and the public to day and planned our several plans that need immediate implementation.

1. They decided on the immediate need to release all journalists’ help in detention for no reason or accusation by the State. Namely Mr. Tissanayagam who has been held captive by the Sri Lankan government for over 135 days at present.
2. They also added that all journalists across the region need to have the Right to information. Especially without condemnation and violation.
3. All involved in media need to have decent working conditions provided with adequate wages, so that they would not have to compromise on their integrity for basic living requirements.
4. They also added the need for editorial independence and the need to strengthen and uphold this independence.
5. The maintenance of the Public Service Media was another concern discussed. They ask for culturally, economically and politically inclusive independence.
6. They also call for immediate stop to all forms of threat by the State, people groups, religious and ethnic groups or political parties. No other group of people should be able to pose any form of threat to any media personnel.
7. They also emphasized the need to share information across SAARC countries, bringing all media networks together.
8. They also stressed on the importance of getting the younger generations interested in world issues and media.

Thus, ended the discussion regarding media and the Right to information.]]>
This session was conducted as a discussion by 11 delegates who were involved in media, journalism and the press. 

They discussed many issues faced by journalists and the public to day and planned our several plans that need immediate implementation.

1. They decided on the immediate need to release all journalists’ help in detention for no reason or accusation by the State. Namely Mr. Tissanayagam who has been held captive by the Sri Lankan government for over 135 days at present.
2. They also added that all journalists across the region need to have the Right to information. Especially without condemnation and violation.
3. All involved in media need to have decent working conditions provided with adequate wages, so that they would not have to compromise on their integrity for basic living requirements.
4. They also added the need for editorial independence and the need to strengthen and uphold this independence.
5. The maintenance of the Public Service Media was another concern discussed. They ask for culturally, economically and politically inclusive independence.
6. They also call for immediate stop to all forms of threat by the State, people groups, religious and ethnic groups or political parties. No other group of people should be able to pose any form of threat to any media personnel.
7. They also emphasized the need to share information across SAARC countries, bringing all media networks together.
8. They also stressed on the importance of getting the younger generations interested in world issues and media.

Thus, ended the discussion regarding media and the Right to information.]]> http://peoplespacesl.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=14 Tue, 30 Mar 2010 05:09:06 -0400 http://peoplespacesl.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=14 • All South Asian workers have to be together and work together this is the South Asian dream
• We request from this meeting to continue the process and work together towards a more united South Asia
• Also request from this forum to help the Nepalese workers, this is time to show our real compassion
• The political party must take action
• When talking about labour’s rights we have to forget our nationality and have to work together for rights
• There are many forms of discrimination, based on gender, religion, and ethnicity
• Human rights vs. political rights
• Discussion with trade unions
• Labour issues are roughly addressed
• Migrant workers’ rights must develop
• And it is essential that this includes safety
• Migrant labour is also mainly a women’s issue and this must be taken into consideration
• There must be rights to association and right to social security

Sri Lanka
• South Asian working charter becoming more and more necessary
• Sri Lanka is trying to develop labour rights
• 30,000 vacant in government sector
• Sri Lankan factories have been moved to India
• WE have to increase worker solidarity
• If we can develop charter for labour rights in South Asia it will be a great step towards a sustainable solution

Nepal 
• Election and political rights
• Identification for formal workers 
• Hotel and domestic workers have a lack of rights and we need to develop those rights

Bangladesh
• There is not simply the political identity but many other dimensions as well. 
• Politically it can’t work in the working place, this is a very important fact of labour rights
• And there is an increase in militarization
• We must be the vision for the community workers to follow]]> • All South Asian workers have to be together and work together this is the South Asian dream
• We request from this meeting to continue the process and work together towards a more united South Asia
• Also request from this forum to help the Nepalese workers, this is time to show our real compassion
• The political party must take action
• When talking about labour’s rights we have to forget our nationality and have to work together for rights
• There are many forms of discrimination, based on gender, religion, and ethnicity
• Human rights vs. political rights
• Discussion with trade unions
• Labour issues are roughly addressed
• Migrant workers’ rights must develop
• And it is essential that this includes safety
• Migrant labour is also mainly a women’s issue and this must be taken into consideration
• There must be rights to association and right to social security

Sri Lanka
• South Asian working charter becoming more and more necessary
• Sri Lanka is trying to develop labour rights
• 30,000 vacant in government sector
• Sri Lankan factories have been moved to India
• WE have to increase worker solidarity
• If we can develop charter for labour rights in South Asia it will be a great step towards a sustainable solution

Nepal 
• Election and political rights
• Identification for formal workers 
• Hotel and domestic workers have a lack of rights and we need to develop those rights

Bangladesh
• There is not simply the political identity but many other dimensions as well. 
• Politically it can’t work in the working place, this is a very important fact of labour rights
• And there is an increase in militarization
• We must be the vision for the community workers to follow]]> http://peoplespacesl.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=13 Tue, 30 Mar 2010 05:08:31 -0400 http://peoplespacesl.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=13
• Presentation was made by a variety of speakers ranging from reasons of debt cancellation to how climate justice can be improved in South Asia
• There were speakers from Sri Lanka, India, Bangladesh and the Philippines
• The speaker form India stated that 25% of the Kerala’s state revenue are dedicated to repay loans
• Pro-World Bank and IMF policies are pushed through without any regard to what is truly best for the people
• There is a major lack of expertise
• There is a problem of external debt vs. internal debt
• Internal debt can be taken from small farmers and other people who need loans from local banks
• The state has a few main responsibilities and it is not meeting these responsibilities. They are supposed to ensure public services, education and health and they are failing
• The speaker form Bangladesh described the immense poverty currently plaguing his country
• The coastal area of Bangladesh is the most severely affected because of the climate change and its expectation to make the sea level rise forcing the eviction of all the people who live on the coast. 
• The external debt question is that of taking substantial amount of money from foreign donors
• There needs to be a united campaign of debt cancellation
• And a realization that these countries are poor and simply can not pay back the debt, because the money that should be going to the population and helping them to rise from their impoverished situation is going back to foreign donors to pay back debt and interest on debt
• There is a cold global economy structure; the Global South is clearly losing and the Global North is clearly gaining, it is a structural problem
• Bangladesh is excluded form debt cancellation
• And the foreign donors are saying that is it is sustainable debt, when it is only sustainable for them
• The poverty and debt issue is linked in many of these countries
• There needs to be more of a focus on ensuring fundamental human rights to the population instead of focusing how to repay debt
• The speaker from the Philippines was saying how debt should be analyzed through the context of ODA (Official Development Assistance).
• And this is a very interesting time too since there is a review of the MDGs in September and a Doha Review in November, among other international re-assessments.
• In 2009 there is an expectation of debt to double in developing countries 
• The issue of debt is aid-effectiveness
• They have been forced by donors to borrow instead of donors giving them grants, but the grants have turned into loans and the loans have caused the debt crisis. Aid-effectiveness is an issue. 
• There is 20% of compound interest in the Philippines and this portrays a great deal about the donor to debtor relationship
• And there is an issue of conditionality with money loaned, such as structural conditionality. Such as if I give you money your country ahs to buy my goods and such. There are many dimensions to the impact of debt.
• The state does not have enough money since they are paying for debt
• There is the example of Japan pushing infrastructure projects when giving other countries loans. 
• Aid-effectiveness is seriously hindered if there is debt
• There needs to be a more widely accepted belief of debt cancellation
• Debt is because of lack of aid-effectiveness
• 2 years ago 90% of the Philippines national income was dedicated to debt
• The pattern is the country goes into a heavy program of borrowing until it basically becomes dependent of it.
• And debt is only sustainable when it does not violate human rights and human development
• It should be based on the country’s ability to pay
• Debt is unsustainable and illegitimate for many reasons
• Donor governments lend so lenders can buy their goods
• And there is the issue of corruption a lot of money loaned is lost in the home government’s corruption, which is only fuelled by the donor governments.]]>
• Presentation was made by a variety of speakers ranging from reasons of debt cancellation to how climate justice can be improved in South Asia
• There were speakers from Sri Lanka, India, Bangladesh and the Philippines
• The speaker form India stated that 25% of the Kerala’s state revenue are dedicated to repay loans
• Pro-World Bank and IMF policies are pushed through without any regard to what is truly best for the people
• There is a major lack of expertise
• There is a problem of external debt vs. internal debt
• Internal debt can be taken from small farmers and other people who need loans from local banks
• The state has a few main responsibilities and it is not meeting these responsibilities. They are supposed to ensure public services, education and health and they are failing
• The speaker form Bangladesh described the immense poverty currently plaguing his country
• The coastal area of Bangladesh is the most severely affected because of the climate change and its expectation to make the sea level rise forcing the eviction of all the people who live on the coast. 
• The external debt question is that of taking substantial amount of money from foreign donors
• There needs to be a united campaign of debt cancellation
• And a realization that these countries are poor and simply can not pay back the debt, because the money that should be going to the population and helping them to rise from their impoverished situation is going back to foreign donors to pay back debt and interest on debt
• There is a cold global economy structure; the Global South is clearly losing and the Global North is clearly gaining, it is a structural problem
• Bangladesh is excluded form debt cancellation
• And the foreign donors are saying that is it is sustainable debt, when it is only sustainable for them
• The poverty and debt issue is linked in many of these countries
• There needs to be more of a focus on ensuring fundamental human rights to the population instead of focusing how to repay debt
• The speaker from the Philippines was saying how debt should be analyzed through the context of ODA (Official Development Assistance).
• And this is a very interesting time too since there is a review of the MDGs in September and a Doha Review in November, among other international re-assessments.
• In 2009 there is an expectation of debt to double in developing countries 
• The issue of debt is aid-effectiveness
• They have been forced by donors to borrow instead of donors giving them grants, but the grants have turned into loans and the loans have caused the debt crisis. Aid-effectiveness is an issue. 
• There is 20% of compound interest in the Philippines and this portrays a great deal about the donor to debtor relationship
• And there is an issue of conditionality with money loaned, such as structural conditionality. Such as if I give you money your country ahs to buy my goods and such. There are many dimensions to the impact of debt.
• The state does not have enough money since they are paying for debt
• There is the example of Japan pushing infrastructure projects when giving other countries loans. 
• Aid-effectiveness is seriously hindered if there is debt
• There needs to be a more widely accepted belief of debt cancellation
• Debt is because of lack of aid-effectiveness
• 2 years ago 90% of the Philippines national income was dedicated to debt
• The pattern is the country goes into a heavy program of borrowing until it basically becomes dependent of it.
• And debt is only sustainable when it does not violate human rights and human development
• It should be based on the country’s ability to pay
• Debt is unsustainable and illegitimate for many reasons
• Donor governments lend so lenders can buy their goods
• And there is the issue of corruption a lot of money loaned is lost in the home government’s corruption, which is only fuelled by the donor governments.]]> http://peoplespacesl.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=12 Tue, 30 Mar 2010 05:08:03 -0400 http://peoplespacesl.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=12
Concept of Food Sovereignty 
International Farmers Movement down to the farmers –
The grassroot live how can we have food sovereignty – can it be achieved
Addressed the unified vision for Food Sovereignty and how we could bring this concept vibrantly alive.

FS means to the excluded people of different types which goes down to
Caste, religious fundamentalism, class struggle, development NGO victims depended on natural resources for their living.

Today the situation is extremely bad FS of people are victims of globalization and pre globalization.

Criteria in transformation in feudalism to capitalism 

Catalyst Farmers
Community depended on natural resources now the land is in the hands of contractors and mining community. This eroding of resources has become suicidal to farmers

Fisheries industry too is faced with untold misery.

The state responsibilities are systematically eroding. Basic needs are ignored. They have no access to any resources. 

Hyderabad seed Production instead all sorts of technology has replaced. FS is now a far cry.

Primary produces of the world deprived of food due to this and is sad plight.

Suggest having genuine Land reforms

Water resources
Forest reserves indigenous
A policy supports biochemistry – the basic principle enriching the rich communities depriving employment, food for the people.

Emphasized the need to say no to Globalization no to research the main cause to production of genetic agriculture has damaged the Agrarian sector

Lack of proper wages, social security, legal rights.

State is responsible for the development of the people not the market economy.
Political Sovereignty 
The co-organisers of several groups organisations

Gujaral Experience
Experiences of the Women demonstrators of the sovereignty of food security of women.

Three important perspectives
Critical women’s role
Sustenance and household and family

Women’s skills energy struggle other alternatives bringing about change in the government.

Alternatives

Significance of land ownership.
Collective or individual

Land ownership based on the case of Nepal where tribal women did not allow land owners to sell their land to outsiders instead they did collective farming and saved the 
Tribal lands.

Seed banks stands as buffer during the changes
Pasteurizing communities – fodder bank. This has helped the in resource base and women have ownership preventing migration.

Farmers are now going into new technology. Their knowledge is valuable and scientific in their own sense as higher experience is a life time.

Natural Disaster, Earthquake, floods, communal violence need to have disaster management plans to help the people.

Trade and Food Sovereignty 
Trade and Food Sovereignty is co-existence
The launch of the Campaign was very timely 
Research Campaigns

Free trade and FS can it co exist 
Engineer Free Trade mechanism by multinational
WTO 1995 agreement not finalized. – but has not achieved anything in favour of the farmers due to list of loopholes will not work out.

:US not going to give up subsidies

The forum should recommend
Food Sovereignty need to be operational system. The ideas feasible
WTO agreement to come out with organizing farming document SA can achieve the FS

Latter part of the 20th Century the farmers were well aware of the natural resources and control of the natural resources.

Time to reconsider the economic structural the people who driving the economy. Leads to the ultimate fight for food and water.
Long term issues
Elections
People who fund the campaigns
Get the voices of the people heard
Empower the people to be responsible.
Deprived because lack of proper consultation.

Maldives
80 % fishing community is deprived due to the main causes


Excluded people have good potential more than capable of solving the world crisis.
Successful experience and solutions 
More partnership of middle class, artist , excluded communities.]]>
Concept of Food Sovereignty 
International Farmers Movement down to the farmers –
The grassroot live how can we have food sovereignty – can it be achieved
Addressed the unified vision for Food Sovereignty and how we could bring this concept vibrantly alive.

FS means to the excluded people of different types which goes down to
Caste, religious fundamentalism, class struggle, development NGO victims depended on natural resources for their living.

Today the situation is extremely bad FS of people are victims of globalization and pre globalization.

Criteria in transformation in feudalism to capitalism 

Catalyst Farmers
Community depended on natural resources now the land is in the hands of contractors and mining community. This eroding of resources has become suicidal to farmers

Fisheries industry too is faced with untold misery.

The state responsibilities are systematically eroding. Basic needs are ignored. They have no access to any resources. 

Hyderabad seed Production instead all sorts of technology has replaced. FS is now a far cry.

Primary produces of the world deprived of food due to this and is sad plight.

Suggest having genuine Land reforms

Water resources
Forest reserves indigenous
A policy supports biochemistry – the basic principle enriching the rich communities depriving employment, food for the people.

Emphasized the need to say no to Globalization no to research the main cause to production of genetic agriculture has damaged the Agrarian sector

Lack of proper wages, social security, legal rights.

State is responsible for the development of the people not the market economy.
Political Sovereignty 
The co-organisers of several groups organisations

Gujaral Experience
Experiences of the Women demonstrators of the sovereignty of food security of women.

Three important perspectives
Critical women’s role
Sustenance and household and family

Women’s skills energy struggle other alternatives bringing about change in the government.

Alternatives

Significance of land ownership.
Collective or individual

Land ownership based on the case of Nepal where tribal women did not allow land owners to sell their land to outsiders instead they did collective farming and saved the 
Tribal lands.

Seed banks stands as buffer during the changes
Pasteurizing communities – fodder bank. This has helped the in resource base and women have ownership preventing migration.

Farmers are now going into new technology. Their knowledge is valuable and scientific in their own sense as higher experience is a life time.

Natural Disaster, Earthquake, floods, communal violence need to have disaster management plans to help the people.

Trade and Food Sovereignty 
Trade and Food Sovereignty is co-existence
The launch of the Campaign was very timely 
Research Campaigns

Free trade and FS can it co exist 
Engineer Free Trade mechanism by multinational
WTO 1995 agreement not finalized. – but has not achieved anything in favour of the farmers due to list of loopholes will not work out.

:US not going to give up subsidies

The forum should recommend
Food Sovereignty need to be operational system. The ideas feasible
WTO agreement to come out with organizing farming document SA can achieve the FS

Latter part of the 20th Century the farmers were well aware of the natural resources and control of the natural resources.

Time to reconsider the economic structural the people who driving the economy. Leads to the ultimate fight for food and water.
Long term issues
Elections
People who fund the campaigns
Get the voices of the people heard
Empower the people to be responsible.
Deprived because lack of proper consultation.

Maldives
80 % fishing community is deprived due to the main causes


Excluded people have good potential more than capable of solving the world crisis.
Successful experience and solutions 
More partnership of middle class, artist , excluded communities.]]> http://peoplespacesl.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=11 Tue, 30 Mar 2010 05:07:36 -0400 http://peoplespacesl.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=11
Crucial time in Sri Lankan history with regards to Human Rights: SL faces many Human Rights related, conflict problems. Breakdown in functions of national institutions identified as one major problem. There is little space for the media, civil society, activist and organizations to work, harassment and abduction is high, with little or no investigation. 

The question why there is no investigation of violence was posed. 
Integrity of the institution is key and today questionable. The need for intervention in social setting is vital. Problems encapsulate to Governance – the governance’s stance affects Human Rights, hence, when they fail, the enforcement of Human Rights fails. 

People are unaware of the Human Rights and look to institutions to guide them. When they can’t lodge a complaint, they are silenced. Institutions are in place but without defending the people, protect the Government. 

Human Rights Commission
This is the only national institution to protect and promote human rights, within the public sphere. The constitution also promotes Human Rights and helps facilitate as a defender of the people. However today, it functions as defender of the Government.

The questions are How come? Why this breakdown? 

Another national institution is the Police Commission
The Police Commission came into effect by the 17th amendment of the constitution. 
The PC was formed to act as an independent commission to protect the people. Although this created hope amongst the people it soon deteriorated as complaints were only lodged. Little or no action was seen. 

The Supreme Court is another national institution
The highest Judiciary, although having the ability to judge in the highest form has not delivered. Many failures can be listed. Main reasons for the breakdown in these institutions are:

- There connection with the government - Ineffectiveness of the 17th amendment.
- The President failed to appoint independent people but instead has appointed known people, those committed to him (‘catches’)
- The conflict is there and needs to be resolved. 
- Human Rights mechanisms need to be made powerful only once narrow minded influences are mitigated.

Solution
- These institutions must be strengthened. People with integrity should be appointed, particularly people who will stand up for rule of law. 
- Police and other law enforces should be appointed on merit

Today, human rights have become a challenge with no solution, what should we do?
So far what we have done has not worked and civilians have failed. Democracy will become effective if civilians actively demand for it. Today we are not demanding enough. 

Reasons cited were; Civilians have been curtailed and function with great difficulty. 
Media are curtailed. We were quiet when others were attacked. It is not too late! 

Before 1993, two camps had global thoughts, with global experience and studies, we all know that human rights are all universal, interdependent and invisible. Those who fight for media rights are losing sight of other rights likewise those who fight for other rights such as housing rights etc. 

If we work together then democracy will prevail. 
We are a failing state: In Sudan, Gafoor, a journalist wanted to take a picture of starving boy who was making his way to a UN camp, with a vulture behind him. He took pictures and won the photographer of the year. However, people asked the question – what happened to the boy? Was it a failing of Moral duty? That debate led to the photographer committing suicide. 

Today let us examine our moral duty? 

Mr. Ganeshalingam
In Nov 2006, Presidential commission of Inquiry to investigate and inquire into alleged serious violations of human rights was established under the Commissions of Inquiry (CoI) Act 48. 

The CoI. Act is responsible to 
1. Examine all cases of human rights abuse in SL since Aug 2005. 
2. Is limited to fact finding, and has no prosecutorial / adjudicative powers. 
3. Recommend action to President. 

The President warrant appointing the commission recognized that these investigations and inquiries were to be independent and comprehensive. The warrant states that these should be transparent in conformity with relevant basic international norms and standards. Information would be open to the public. 

The president went on to forming an international independent group of distinctive persons to observe the CoI. Act.

The public were skeptical of the CoI Act’s actual impact on protecting HUMAN RIGHTS and ensuring justice. This was fuelled by investigations being conducted behind closed doors and involvement of the Attorney General’s department.

Currently only 2 cases are before the CoI. Act - Case 2 and 5. 
Case 2 – Muttur-ACF
3 March 2008 the CoI. Act started public sessions inquiring the killing of 17 aid workers. 

Case 5 – Killing of 5 Tamil Youth in Trincomalee, 2 Jan 2006


Engagement of Civil Society
The need for civil society participation arose due to the developments that arose with the testimonies of witnesses via video conference. Members of the civil society noted that witnesses were subject to harassment by STF. 

No legal counsel on behalf of civil society or witnesses were able to intervene or fully and observe the confrontation. It was noted that the hostile nature of questioning remained unchallenged and could result in potential witnesses refusing to come forward. One witness in case 5 refused to give information at the later stage due to receiving threats. 

After testifying via video conference, 2 families of the victims appealed for legal aid and representation to participate in the sessions of inquiry. 

Centre for Policy Alternatives, Home for Human Rights, INFORM, Law & Society Trust, Mothers and Daughters of Lanka, Rights Now – Collective for Democracy and Sri Lankan National Commission of Jurists all came together and applied for standing before the CoI. Act.

The group agreed that for the long term protection of witnesses and HUMAN RIGHTS in SL it would be vitally important to establish the principle of civil society involvement in current and future Commissions of Inquiry. This principle remains untested. 

Legal grounds
The civil society applied for joint full standing before the CoI. Act.

Failure of hybrid structure with IIGEP
The group that consisted of local and international mechanizes to investigate HUMAN RIGHTS violates failed and terminated its mission in March 2008. 

IIGP observations included 
1. Attorney General’s inappropriate and impermissible role in the proceedings of the CoI. 
2. Lack of effective victim and witness protection
Lacked trained staff and finances. 
Lack of transparency and delay in proceedings 
Lack of full cooperation by state entities. 
Lack of financial independence of the CoI. 


Nepal experience - Mr. Gopal Krishna Siwakoti
Nepal has passed through to a peaceful era having overcome a previous rule of terror, arising due to an internal conflict that has killed over 40000 people, and tortured, displaced and displaced many. 

The king staged a coup. National institutions were powerless, non political party or activists safe. During this time, the Nepalese people appealed to Geneva (UN Headquarters) and asked for human right monitors to intervene (OHCHR) to come. After much discussion the monitors arrived. 

The situation in Nepal was critical with regards to human rights. An area detention was imposed, no one allowed to leave and the existing HRSC converted into a wayside ineffective institution. Abductions and displaced people were on the rise. 

Negotiations started. 5 regional offices and 2 centre offices placed. The CPM and Maoists raised protests and a comprehensive agreement was signed by Maoists and 7 parties. The group worked in close coordination with the civil society, which finally resulted in a peaceful end to the conflict and the end of the monarchy. The situation gradually has improved. 

One of the most important developments in terms of human rights was the proposal to set up of the Provision of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Although this is still not set up, it will investigate Human Rights violations, colonizational damage, war crimes etc. Further it will create the opportunity for human rights committees and victims to voice their stories and for violators to be punished. 

Goring problems have arisen as one time violators have become key political personnel. These people are pushing for an amnesty to forgive and forget. However the Civil Society do not want this as they feel there is a need to solidarity on restoration of justice. Justice must prevail and wrong doers must be put to justice. Solidarity is needed, and the office of the human rights and UN in Nepal have been supporting this cause. 

More support from other SAARC countries are requested. Ever after the CPA, there are still incidents of looting, land takeovers, and other human rights violations. 

Nepal is a great example of restoration of human rights. We must continue to fight and must form a collective forum to support their cause. 

Questions posed

1. What organization do you work for in Nepal?
The International Institute of Human Rights Developments. There key focus is to monitor human rights, particularly during a transitional period.
. 
Regarding Nepal’s current predicament: None of the perpetrators have been brought to justice, mainly due to Government intervention. His organization is campaigning to bring these people to justice. Maoists were responsible for many war crimes. Now they are the ‘victors’ and are in governance. So it is difficult to bring the victors as violators. 
International support is sought.


2. In Sri Lanka amongst the civil society there is greater focus on human rights violations by Government but little focus on violations by LTTE. 

Many reasons are cited;
1. Non state actors – fundamentalists were killed in North and East. 
2. Fundamentalist had to operate outside the Ealam
3. Its hard to be a Tamil and raise a violation
4. Polarization – looking at the traditional rule of human rights violations only. 

Another aspect there are no mechanisms in the LTTE controlled territory. Unknown and unsaid, there is no one to lodge complaints to.

Human rights violations are the state’s responsibility In Sri Lanka there is lack of it in both state controlled and uncontrolled state. Civil society is virtually non existent. Even in the south, it is getting there – human rights are on the decline, although in place it is not being imposed. 

3. Manipur is the extreme east of India has been in conflict for over 50 years. The situation is bad. In India we have little international involvement. However, we know that in Sri Lanka there is a consortium for international human rights. How can we develop something similar in Manipur? 

This is true of Sri Lanka, 3 years ago. There were a lot of international readiness and freedom to report. There was international forum that was consulted on how best the international community could help resolve conflict. 

This has changed with the ultra nationalist thinking which believes anything international will affect the sovereignty of the nation. 

Sri Lanka has slumped many times to rock bottoms so we should bounce back. However we must remember that international monitoring intervened on our own request. After political developments and considered a villain of peace, they left. Now any NGO is considered a threat to national sovereignty. 

Many regulations on visas have been enforced, most recently, restrictions for UN staff were imposed and now virtually only local staff can serve as UN staff. 

For North East elections, no foreign journalists were allowed. 
The government’s thinking unless changed, will soon result in a disaster. We can join with Zimbabwe, China, Iran and Gaffor. 

The institutions must work come together and work independently and within the rule of law. Those who are advising them are being paid by public finances. 

Under the cease fire agreement, the SLMM was in place in conflict zone and reported on LTTE and state violations. There were reports. The space has closed down since the new Government came to power. 

People elect the Government and in 2005 the north and east were not allowed to vote. The current Government was not elected by the entire country. The growth of a nationalist movement has brought about little growth. 

A citizen from Trincomalee mentioned that the people have to pay for electing the Government. However the minority can’t be held accountable. Even though we oppose the Government we cannot change it. Majority decides who governs. As minority what is our option – do we fight with full strength?

No prescriptions to the ethnic issue exist. The question is difficult. Individual’s power is needed. Issues are being taken up by both minor and majority. Political issues must be resolved by politicians. But we must look to our moral obligation. 

Take Chilie – entering the developed world. We must speak out. We must not be quiet. Not take up arms. 

Country’s problem is not the evil of the bad people but the silence of t

Religious Extremism and Communalism 

Religious extremism we come with varied ideas and religious background. We are against Bush like systems on religious extremism. 

Our challenge is to determine how we deal with religious extremist. 

Secularism and democracy are considered as two but aren’t they one? 

Pakistan
Experience as a minority member and the difficulty faced during the critical times, intolerance, discrimination. State should protect all religions. Churches are burnt, people are terrorized, victimized etc. forced marriages are brought in, blasphemy laws enforced and instead of bringing people together are creating division. 

One main problem is that state cannot decide if law and religion are interdependent or not .

India
The word Minority should be banned. In US they don’t refer to anyone as a minority. So we should alien the word minority. 

The majority of Pakistan are affected by religious extremists, a by product of communalism; first from British imperialism and second from US imperialism. 

Pakistan people are secular and democratic in nature. In 1971 there were only 7 religious persons elected after 300 members. In East Bengal, the religious parties were badly defeated. 

Now the minority has damaged social fabrics in Pakistan and now has become a potential weapon used by the West to harm the world. 

Religious extremists are not bad, per se. however, you must assess if within the religion it is bad? In Islam or Braham or Christianity the adverse level should be questioned? We should discuss the political use of religion. 

No democracy without secularism. India uses the word secularism in democracy. This resulted in respecting all religions, and the state agreeing to respect all religions. 

One thing People SAARC should do is to examine 60 years of Religious secularism in India. They should analyze history taught in schools and other state institutions on how much influence religion has. 

As civil society we should monitor human rights, particularly minority groups. World over, including US, minority groups are discriminated. We need to create a body that would address minority groups’ human rights violations. The commission should have powers to investigate and report on complaints lodged. Eg. Romanian Commission on Equal Opportunity. If individuals are discriminated they must be brought to justice. 

SAARC should monitor equal rights.

Kashmir
Serious concern on Islamic movement and international propaganda. 

The political movement in Kashmir: Does it reflect the Islamic movement? 
In South Asia we tend to focus more on religion conflicts vs. other conflicts. 
In India more people are being pushed into religious extremists, not as much spiritual but politically driven. 

Covert Communalism is on the rise. After bombs no riots take place however the division amongst people is growing. The division amongst Hindus and Muslims has grown immensely over the last few years. 

What will happen when communities divide? Civil war is probable.
Problems to recognizing minority rights;
1. Christians in India own certain top institutions. When violence breaks out, the Christians show preference to the elite, Brahmin etc. they exclude low caste. However, they fight for minority rights, hence contradiction of viewpoints. 


Comments
1. Way to sabotage the terrorist who act in the name of religions is to not allow this division to take place. 
E.g. during security checks let Muslims be a part of the check, assuring the people of their safety. 

2. We should demand for secularism in SAARC, create minority commissions to safeguard rights. 

3. We need to work at SAARC level as countries normally don’t like displaced people. ‘People of no where’

4. “If you are not making justice for the just, then you are not making justice” we are here to explore peace through dialogue. 

5. In Pakistan if Hindu says few words against Holy Prophet he might be killed by police or prison mates or hung. This is the law that does not ‘tolerate’ the minority. Hence we must not say minority – we must guard our future.

6. Fundamentalists and extremism are fairly new to this region. We must consider the foreign influence. 

7. Nationalism and religion have incorporated itself to the government. In Sri Lanka there are problems within Sinhalese and Tamil, Buddhists and Christians. We have many religions but dominant people are pushing for a sovereign Buddhist nation. If NE conflict is resolved, we might have a religious conflict. Christians, Muslims and Hindus are oppressed. Many churches are being burnt. Government is turning a blind eye. However Buddhist parties (Sinhala Urumaya) and Prime Minister endorse a sovereign Buddhist country. 

8. We should have a visa free SAARC – many are detained on invalid visa grounds. 

Demands to SAARC Governments

1. Religion should be separate from state

2. All blasphemy laws should be abolished

3. Non discriminative education system – all public institutions should include minority curriculums

4. Sri Lankan government to be questioned about the promotion of a Buddhist sovereign nation

5. Persecution of minorities should be stopped

6. The state should be given a reporting system – record incidents etc. 

7. Positive enforcement of all communities 

8. These all represent breakdown in democracy 

9. Differences in religion should be addressed

10. Minority rights are symptoms to bigger issues which should be resolved

11. Establish SAARC Human Rights forum, a powerful creation of a minority groups that look into rights of religions with 50% female involvement

12. Given the history of riots, in all SAARC countries, there should be speedy honorable compensation made to the individuals

13. Special courts to bring speedy action so that justice will be brought to court

14. Government should be held responsible ad accountable]]>
Crucial time in Sri Lankan history with regards to Human Rights: SL faces many Human Rights related, conflict problems. Breakdown in functions of national institutions identified as one major problem. There is little space for the media, civil society, activist and organizations to work, harassment and abduction is high, with little or no investigation. 

The question why there is no investigation of violence was posed. 
Integrity of the institution is key and today questionable. The need for intervention in social setting is vital. Problems encapsulate to Governance – the governance’s stance affects Human Rights, hence, when they fail, the enforcement of Human Rights fails. 

People are unaware of the Human Rights and look to institutions to guide them. When they can’t lodge a complaint, they are silenced. Institutions are in place but without defending the people, protect the Government. 

Human Rights Commission
This is the only national institution to protect and promote human rights, within the public sphere. The constitution also promotes Human Rights and helps facilitate as a defender of the people. However today, it functions as defender of the Government.

The questions are How come? Why this breakdown? 

Another national institution is the Police Commission
The Police Commission came into effect by the 17th amendment of the constitution. 
The PC was formed to act as an independent commission to protect the people. Although this created hope amongst the people it soon deteriorated as complaints were only lodged. Little or no action was seen. 

The Supreme Court is another national institution
The highest Judiciary, although having the ability to judge in the highest form has not delivered. Many failures can be listed. Main reasons for the breakdown in these institutions are:

- There connection with the government - Ineffectiveness of the 17th amendment.
- The President failed to appoint independent people but instead has appointed known people, those committed to him (‘catches’)
- The conflict is there and needs to be resolved. 
- Human Rights mechanisms need to be made powerful only once narrow minded influences are mitigated.

Solution
- These institutions must be strengthened. People with integrity should be appointed, particularly people who will stand up for rule of law. 
- Police and other law enforces should be appointed on merit

Today, human rights have become a challenge with no solution, what should we do?
So far what we have done has not worked and civilians have failed. Democracy will become effective if civilians actively demand for it. Today we are not demanding enough. 

Reasons cited were; Civilians have been curtailed and function with great difficulty. 
Media are curtailed. We were quiet when others were attacked. It is not too late! 

Before 1993, two camps had global thoughts, with global experience and studies, we all know that human rights are all universal, interdependent and invisible. Those who fight for media rights are losing sight of other rights likewise those who fight for other rights such as housing rights etc. 

If we work together then democracy will prevail. 
We are a failing state: In Sudan, Gafoor, a journalist wanted to take a picture of starving boy who was making his way to a UN camp, with a vulture behind him. He took pictures and won the photographer of the year. However, people asked the question – what happened to the boy? Was it a failing of Moral duty? That debate led to the photographer committing suicide. 

Today let us examine our moral duty? 

Mr. Ganeshalingam
In Nov 2006, Presidential commission of Inquiry to investigate and inquire into alleged serious violations of human rights was established under the Commissions of Inquiry (CoI) Act 48. 

The CoI. Act is responsible to 
1. Examine all cases of human rights abuse in SL since Aug 2005. 
2. Is limited to fact finding, and has no prosecutorial / adjudicative powers. 
3. Recommend action to President. 

The President warrant appointing the commission recognized that these investigations and inquiries were to be independent and comprehensive. The warrant states that these should be transparent in conformity with relevant basic international norms and standards. Information would be open to the public. 

The president went on to forming an international independent group of distinctive persons to observe the CoI. Act.

The public were skeptical of the CoI Act’s actual impact on protecting HUMAN RIGHTS and ensuring justice. This was fuelled by investigations being conducted behind closed doors and involvement of the Attorney General’s department.

Currently only 2 cases are before the CoI. Act - Case 2 and 5. 
Case 2 – Muttur-ACF
3 March 2008 the CoI. Act started public sessions inquiring the killing of 17 aid workers. 

Case 5 – Killing of 5 Tamil Youth in Trincomalee, 2 Jan 2006


Engagement of Civil Society
The need for civil society participation arose due to the developments that arose with the testimonies of witnesses via video conference. Members of the civil society noted that witnesses were subject to harassment by STF. 

No legal counsel on behalf of civil society or witnesses were able to intervene or fully and observe the confrontation. It was noted that the hostile nature of questioning remained unchallenged and could result in potential witnesses refusing to come forward. One witness in case 5 refused to give information at the later stage due to receiving threats. 

After testifying via video conference, 2 families of the victims appealed for legal aid and representation to participate in the sessions of inquiry. 

Centre for Policy Alternatives, Home for Human Rights, INFORM, Law & Society Trust, Mothers and Daughters of Lanka, Rights Now – Collective for Democracy and Sri Lankan National Commission of Jurists all came together and applied for standing before the CoI. Act.

The group agreed that for the long term protection of witnesses and HUMAN RIGHTS in SL it would be vitally important to establish the principle of civil society involvement in current and future Commissions of Inquiry. This principle remains untested. 

Legal grounds
The civil society applied for joint full standing before the CoI. Act.

Failure of hybrid structure with IIGEP
The group that consisted of local and international mechanizes to investigate HUMAN RIGHTS violates failed and terminated its mission in March 2008. 

IIGP observations included 
1. Attorney General’s inappropriate and impermissible role in the proceedings of the CoI. 
2. Lack of effective victim and witness protection
Lacked trained staff and finances. 
Lack of transparency and delay in proceedings 
Lack of full cooperation by state entities. 
Lack of financial independence of the CoI. 


Nepal experience - Mr. Gopal Krishna Siwakoti
Nepal has passed through to a peaceful era having overcome a previous rule of terror, arising due to an internal conflict that has killed over 40000 people, and tortured, displaced and displaced many. 

The king staged a coup. National institutions were powerless, non political party or activists safe. During this time, the Nepalese people appealed to Geneva (UN Headquarters) and asked for human right monitors to intervene (OHCHR) to come. After much discussion the monitors arrived. 

The situation in Nepal was critical with regards to human rights. An area detention was imposed, no one allowed to leave and the existing HRSC converted into a wayside ineffective institution. Abductions and displaced people were on the rise. 

Negotiations started. 5 regional offices and 2 centre offices placed. The CPM and Maoists raised protests and a comprehensive agreement was signed by Maoists and 7 parties. The group worked in close coordination with the civil society, which finally resulted in a peaceful end to the conflict and the end of the monarchy. The situation gradually has improved. 

One of the most important developments in terms of human rights was the proposal to set up of the Provision of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Although this is still not set up, it will investigate Human Rights violations, colonizational damage, war crimes etc. Further it will create the opportunity for human rights committees and victims to voice their stories and for violators to be punished. 

Goring problems have arisen as one time violators have become key political personnel. These people are pushing for an amnesty to forgive and forget. However the Civil Society do not want this as they feel there is a need to solidarity on restoration of justice. Justice must prevail and wrong doers must be put to justice. Solidarity is needed, and the office of the human rights and UN in Nepal have been supporting this cause. 

More support from other SAARC countries are requested. Ever after the CPA, there are still incidents of looting, land takeovers, and other human rights violations. 

Nepal is a great example of restoration of human rights. We must continue to fight and must form a collective forum to support their cause. 

Questions posed

1. What organization do you work for in Nepal?
The International Institute of Human Rights Developments. There key focus is to monitor human rights, particularly during a transitional period.
. 
Regarding Nepal’s current predicament: None of the perpetrators have been brought to justice, mainly due to Government intervention. His organization is campaigning to bring these people to justice. Maoists were responsible for many war crimes. Now they are the ‘victors’ and are in governance. So it is difficult to bring the victors as violators. 
International support is sought.


2. In Sri Lanka amongst the civil society there is greater focus on human rights violations by Government but little focus on violations by LTTE. 

Many reasons are cited;
1. Non state actors – fundamentalists were killed in North and East. 
2. Fundamentalist had to operate outside the Ealam
3. Its hard to be a Tamil and raise a violation
4. Polarization – looking at the traditional rule of human rights violations only. 

Another aspect there are no mechanisms in the LTTE controlled territory. Unknown and unsaid, there is no one to lodge complaints to.

Human rights violations are the state’s responsibility In Sri Lanka there is lack of it in both state controlled and uncontrolled state. Civil society is virtually non existent. Even in the south, it is getting there – human rights are on the decline, although in place it is not being imposed. 

3. Manipur is the extreme east of India has been in conflict for over 50 years. The situation is bad. In India we have little international involvement. However, we know that in Sri Lanka there is a consortium for international human rights. How can we develop something similar in Manipur? 

This is true of Sri Lanka, 3 years ago. There were a lot of international readiness and freedom to report. There was international forum that was consulted on how best the international community could help resolve conflict. 

This has changed with the ultra nationalist thinking which believes anything international will affect the sovereignty of the nation. 

Sri Lanka has slumped many times to rock bottoms so we should bounce back. However we must remember that international monitoring intervened on our own request. After political developments and considered a villain of peace, they left. Now any NGO is considered a threat to national sovereignty. 

Many regulations on visas have been enforced, most recently, restrictions for UN staff were imposed and now virtually only local staff can serve as UN staff. 

For North East elections, no foreign journalists were allowed. 
The government’s thinking unless changed, will soon result in a disaster. We can join with Zimbabwe, China, Iran and Gaffor. 

The institutions must work come together and work independently and within the rule of law. Those who are advising them are being paid by public finances. 

Under the cease fire agreement, the SLMM was in place in conflict zone and reported on LTTE and state violations. There were reports. The space has closed down since the new Government came to power. 

People elect the Government and in 2005 the north and east were not allowed to vote. The current Government was not elected by the entire country. The growth of a nationalist movement has brought about little growth. 

A citizen from Trincomalee mentioned that the people have to pay for electing the Government. However the minority can’t be held accountable. Even though we oppose the Government we cannot change it. Majority decides who governs. As minority what is our option – do we fight with full strength?

No prescriptions to the ethnic issue exist. The question is difficult. Individual’s power is needed. Issues are being taken up by both minor and majority. Political issues must be resolved by politicians. But we must look to our moral obligation. 

Take Chilie – entering the developed world. We must speak out. We must not be quiet. Not take up arms. 

Country’s problem is not the evil of the bad people but the silence of t

Religious Extremism and Communalism 

Religious extremism we come with varied ideas and religious background. We are against Bush like systems on religious extremism. 

Our challenge is to determine how we deal with religious extremist. 

Secularism and democracy are considered as two but aren’t they one? 

Pakistan
Experience as a minority member and the difficulty faced during the critical times, intolerance, discrimination. State should protect all religions. Churches are burnt, people are terrorized, victimized etc. forced marriages are brought in, blasphemy laws enforced and instead of bringing people together are creating division. 

One main problem is that state cannot decide if law and religion are interdependent or not .

India
The word Minority should be banned. In US they don’t refer to anyone as a minority. So we should alien the word minority. 

The majority of Pakistan are affected by religious extremists, a by product of communalism; first from British imperialism and second from US imperialism. 

Pakistan people are secular and democratic in nature. In 1971 there were only 7 religious persons elected after 300 members. In East Bengal, the religious parties were badly defeated. 

Now the minority has damaged social fabrics in Pakistan and now has become a potential weapon used by the West to harm the world. 

Religious extremists are not bad, per se. however, you must assess if within the religion it is bad? In Islam or Braham or Christianity the adverse level should be questioned? We should discuss the political use of religion. 

No democracy without secularism. India uses the word secularism in democracy. This resulted in respecting all religions, and the state agreeing to respect all religions. 

One thing People SAARC should do is to examine 60 years of Religious secularism in India. They should analyze history taught in schools and other state institutions on how much influence religion has. 

As civil society we should monitor human rights, particularly minority groups. World over, including US, minority groups are discriminated. We need to create a body that would address minority groups’ human rights violations. The commission should have powers to investigate and report on complaints lodged. Eg. Romanian Commission on Equal Opportunity. If individuals are discriminated they must be brought to justice. 

SAARC should monitor equal rights.

Kashmir
Serious concern on Islamic movement and international propaganda. 

The political movement in Kashmir: Does it reflect the Islamic movement? 
In South Asia we tend to focus more on religion conflicts vs. other conflicts. 
In India more people are being pushed into religious extremists, not as much spiritual but politically driven. 

Covert Communalism is on the rise. After bombs no riots take place however the division amongst people is growing. The division amongst Hindus and Muslims has grown immensely over the last few years. 

What will happen when communities divide? Civil war is probable.
Problems to recognizing minority rights;
1. Christians in India own certain top institutions. When violence breaks out, the Christians show preference to the elite, Brahmin etc. they exclude low caste. However, they fight for minority rights, hence contradiction of viewpoints. 


Comments
1. Way to sabotage the terrorist who act in the name of religions is to not allow this division to take place. 
E.g. during security checks let Muslims be a part of the check, assuring the people of their safety. 

2. We should demand for secularism in SAARC, create minority commissions to safeguard rights. 

3. We need to work at SAARC level as countries normally don’t like displaced people. ‘People of no where’

4. “If you are not making justice for the just, then you are not making justice” we are here to explore peace through dialogue. 

5. In Pakistan if Hindu says few words against Holy Prophet he might be killed by police or prison mates or hung. This is the law that does not ‘tolerate’ the minority. Hence we must not say minority – we must guard our future.

6. Fundamentalists and extremism are fairly new to this region. We must consider the foreign influence. 

7. Nationalism and religion have incorporated itself to the government. In Sri Lanka there are problems within Sinhalese and Tamil, Buddhists and Christians. We have many religions but dominant people are pushing for a sovereign Buddhist nation. If NE conflict is resolved, we might have a religious conflict. Christians, Muslims and Hindus are oppressed. Many churches are being burnt. Government is turning a blind eye. However Buddhist parties (Sinhala Urumaya) and Prime Minister endorse a sovereign Buddhist country. 

8. We should have a visa free SAARC – many are detained on invalid visa grounds. 

Demands to SAARC Governments

1. Religion should be separate from state

2. All blasphemy laws should be abolished

3. Non discriminative education system – all public institutions should include minority curriculums

4. Sri Lankan government to be questioned about the promotion of a Buddhist sovereign nation

5. Persecution of minorities should be stopped

6. The state should be given a reporting system – record incidents etc. 

7. Positive enforcement of all communities 

8. These all represent breakdown in democracy 

9. Differences in religion should be addressed

10. Minority rights are symptoms to bigger issues which should be resolved

11. Establish SAARC Human Rights forum, a powerful creation of a minority groups that look into rights of religions with 50% female involvement

12. Given the history of riots, in all SAARC countries, there should be speedy honorable compensation made to the individuals

13. Special courts to bring speedy action so that justice will be brought to court

14. Government should be held responsible ad accountable]]> http://peoplespacesl.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=10 Tue, 30 Mar 2010 05:06:58 -0400 http://peoplespacesl.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=10
One panelist spoke abut accessibility for the disabled. He said at present 250 Technical Officers of various government organizations are being trained, to make buildings accessible fro the disabled. He suggested that in future Public building Permits must be approved only to plans that incorporate features that make the building accessible to the disabled. He also requested the audience that just because there are no facilities for the disabled the disabled people should not shy away from using such buildings. By showing how difficult these buildings are to be accessed the relevant authorities will take action to remedy the situation. He requested disabled people not to be invisible. If disabled people made themselves invisible no progress could be made.

Mr. Kularatane a visually handicapped from Galle mentioned that people must be unscrupulous NGO's and to be self reliant. He mentioned the fact that during the Tsunami many NGO's in Indonesia enriched themselves by using the name of the victims. He said that there must be educational and technical institutes for the handicapped so that, they can be gainfully employed. He blamed the current open economic policy for the lack of opportunities for the disabled.

Mr. Jaffer Shah from Pakistan said that he was working against the use of drugs by the youth of Pakistan. As a result he was shot by the Drug Mafia and lost the use of both legs. He was disappointed by the poor attendance. Further he said that awareness must be created by Rallies and Protests. In this effort they need the support of the able bodied people also. He spoke at length about the regional co-operation in connection with this.

During the group discussion the following ideas were put forward by the participants.

1. Educational and Skilled Development facilities must be provided.
2. Must change the ideology about disability. I they should not be referred to as Disabled).
3. Only by Protest and Rallies we can win our rights.
4. In the Rural areas disabled people face problems much more than other areas.
5. In Public Transport seats allocated for Disabled Persons are occupied by the able bodied people.
6. Solutions to our problems are given in a Top-down way rather than the Bottom-up way.
7. Mentally disabled peoples problems are rarely highlighted.
8. Although for International Women's Day celebration so many women are invited and felicitated, but no even one handicapped woman was invited.
9. In Bangladesh the Bill, - "Right of the Disabled" was changed to "Welfare of the Disabled." Thereby reducing the value of it to the Disabled.
10. No mechanism to meet activists from different SAARC countries.

The Workshop ended with Ms. Niluka Gunawardana stating that the above suggestions will be incorporated into the resolutions to be presented.]]>
One panelist spoke abut accessibility for the disabled. He said at present 250 Technical Officers of various government organizations are being trained, to make buildings accessible fro the disabled. He suggested that in future Public building Permits must be approved only to plans that incorporate features that make the building accessible to the disabled. He also requested the audience that just because there are no facilities for the disabled the disabled people should not shy away from using such buildings. By showing how difficult these buildings are to be accessed the relevant authorities will take action to remedy the situation. He requested disabled people not to be invisible. If disabled people made themselves invisible no progress could be made.

Mr. Kularatane a visually handicapped from Galle mentioned that people must be unscrupulous NGO's and to be self reliant. He mentioned the fact that during the Tsunami many NGO's in Indonesia enriched themselves by using the name of the victims. He said that there must be educational and technical institutes for the handicapped so that, they can be gainfully employed. He blamed the current open economic policy for the lack of opportunities for the disabled.

Mr. Jaffer Shah from Pakistan said that he was working against the use of drugs by the youth of Pakistan. As a result he was shot by the Drug Mafia and lost the use of both legs. He was disappointed by the poor attendance. Further he said that awareness must be created by Rallies and Protests. In this effort they need the support of the able bodied people also. He spoke at length about the regional co-operation in connection with this.

During the group discussion the following ideas were put forward by the participants.

1. Educational and Skilled Development facilities must be provided.
2. Must change the ideology about disability. I they should not be referred to as Disabled).
3. Only by Protest and Rallies we can win our rights.
4. In the Rural areas disabled people face problems much more than other areas.
5. In Public Transport seats allocated for Disabled Persons are occupied by the able bodied people.
6. Solutions to our problems are given in a Top-down way rather than the Bottom-up way.
7. Mentally disabled peoples problems are rarely highlighted.
8. Although for International Women's Day celebration so many women are invited and felicitated, but no even one handicapped woman was invited.
9. In Bangladesh the Bill, - "Right of the Disabled" was changed to "Welfare of the Disabled." Thereby reducing the value of it to the Disabled.
10. No mechanism to meet activists from different SAARC countries.

The Workshop ended with Ms. Niluka Gunawardana stating that the above suggestions will be incorporated into the resolutions to be presented.]]> http://peoplespacesl.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=9 Tue, 30 Mar 2010 05:06:02 -0400 http://peoplespacesl.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=9
• Our sentiments are enshrined in the UN Charter and the UN Declaration on Human Rights and the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the constitutions and legislative enactments of many of the countries represented at the South Asian People’s Assembly. 

• There is a need for an exclusive focus on disability rights due to: 

- The marginalization and complete invisibility of disabled individuals in South Asia in all spheres of life including the economic, social, cultural, educational, political, judicial, reproductive and personal.
- The lack of awareness regarding specific disabilities and the diversity of disabilities.
- The stigma arising due to presumptions and stereotypes of disability.
- The discomfort and unwillingness associated with addressing disabilities not only at the State level but also at the public and private levels, even within grass roots activist movements in South Asia. 
- The non existence of legislation to guarantee the rights of persons with disabilities in some South Asian countries; whereas even in countries where such legislations exists the lack of implementation negates the efficacy of such enactments. 
- The physical barriers to accessibility faced by persons with accessibility when accessing public spaces including built spaces and transportation; furthermore, emotional barriers to socio-economic accessibility due to attitudinal barriers and social invisibility.

• We strongly urge for :

- The involvement and mobilization of all people whether they identify as being differently-abled or not, in ensuring equal rights and dignity for persons with disability in South Asia
- The regional co-operation, educational and cultural exchange, dialogue, regional level activism and campaigning, scholarships (disability studies), financial mechanisms (such as reclaiming home based manufacture and micro credit systems) and political accountability as pertaining to disability rights in South Asia.
- The women with disabilities to be integrated to the larger social movements, especially the women’s movement in South Asia; furthermore, we advocate for the recognition and integration of women with disabilities in to the workforce and positions of political, and similarly, socio-economic leadership.
- The inclusion of persons with disabilities in all decision making processes in South Asia
- The immediate, dynamic and continuous implementation of existing legislation and regulation pertaining to the rights of disabilities in areas such as education, accessibility and housing and the guarantee of all rights of persons with disability; furthermore, we call for the enactment of new legislation ensuring all rights of persons with disabilities. 
- The recognition and of the needs and vitality of families, friends and associates of individuals with disabilities within the movement towards creating an inclusive South Asia.

• We resolve to:

- Establish a South Asian Forum on disability in conjunction with the South Asian People’s Assembly to build upon the dialogue, co-operation, regional activism, avenues for scholarly collaboration and solidarity established at the South Asian People’s Assembly in Colombo on July 19th 2008.
- Such a Forum would act as a regional co-ordinating mechanism for – 
- dialogue on disability rights in South Asia
- regional activism, campaigning and lobbying
- Establishing awareness programs aimed at eliminating attitudinal barriers
- Establishing Disability Studies Programs at universities and institutions of higher education in South Asia.
- Establishing disability rights as a vital focus point in the social, economic and political agendas of South Asia.
- Establishing regional economic mechanisms including micro-financing, skills sharing and marketing of goods manufactured by persons with disabilities.
- Establishing a regional network of disability rights organizations and allied groups.]]>
• Our sentiments are enshrined in the UN Charter and the UN Declaration on Human Rights and the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the constitutions and legislative enactments of many of the countries represented at the South Asian People’s Assembly. 

• There is a need for an exclusive focus on disability rights due to: 

- The marginalization and complete invisibility of disabled individuals in South Asia in all spheres of life including the economic, social, cultural, educational, political, judicial, reproductive and personal.
- The lack of awareness regarding specific disabilities and the diversity of disabilities.
- The stigma arising due to presumptions and stereotypes of disability.
- The discomfort and unwillingness associated with addressing disabilities not only at the State level but also at the public and private levels, even within grass roots activist movements in South Asia. 
- The non existence of legislation to guarantee the rights of persons with disabilities in some South Asian countries; whereas even in countries where such legislations exists the lack of implementation negates the efficacy of such enactments. 
- The physical barriers to accessibility faced by persons with accessibility when accessing public spaces including built spaces and transportation; furthermore, emotional barriers to socio-economic accessibility due to attitudinal barriers and social invisibility.

• We strongly urge for :

- The involvement and mobilization of all people whether they identify as being differently-abled or not, in ensuring equal rights and dignity for persons with disability in South Asia
- The regional co-operation, educational and cultural exchange, dialogue, regional level activism and campaigning, scholarships (disability studies), financial mechanisms (such as reclaiming home based manufacture and micro credit systems) and political accountability as pertaining to disability rights in South Asia.
- The women with disabilities to be integrated to the larger social movements, especially the women’s movement in South Asia; furthermore, we advocate for the recognition and integration of women with disabilities in to the workforce and positions of political, and similarly, socio-economic leadership.
- The inclusion of persons with disabilities in all decision making processes in South Asia
- The immediate, dynamic and continuous implementation of existing legislation and regulation pertaining to the rights of disabilities in areas such as education, accessibility and housing and the guarantee of all rights of persons with disability; furthermore, we call for the enactment of new legislation ensuring all rights of persons with disabilities. 
- The recognition and of the needs and vitality of families, friends and associates of individuals with disabilities within the movement towards creating an inclusive South Asia.

• We resolve to:

- Establish a South Asian Forum on disability in conjunction with the South Asian People’s Assembly to build upon the dialogue, co-operation, regional activism, avenues for scholarly collaboration and solidarity established at the South Asian People’s Assembly in Colombo on July 19th 2008.
- Such a Forum would act as a regional co-ordinating mechanism for – 
- dialogue on disability rights in South Asia
- regional activism, campaigning and lobbying
- Establishing awareness programs aimed at eliminating attitudinal barriers
- Establishing Disability Studies Programs at universities and institutions of higher education in South Asia.
- Establishing disability rights as a vital focus point in the social, economic and political agendas of South Asia.
- Establishing regional economic mechanisms including micro-financing, skills sharing and marketing of goods manufactured by persons with disabilities.
- Establishing a regional network of disability rights organizations and allied groups.]]>